2007
DOI: 10.1080/01690960601049628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
101
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
21
101
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In respect of speech perception, results showed a significant orthographic effect on auditory lexical decision but not on shadowing, thus replicating previous findings with real words (e.g. Pattamadilok et al, 2007;Ziegler et al, 2004). In respect of speech production, results showed for the first time an effect of orthography on simple picture naming that emerged immediately following the introduction of the spellings of words on the second day, and that persisted in testing on the third day.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In respect of speech perception, results showed a significant orthographic effect on auditory lexical decision but not on shadowing, thus replicating previous findings with real words (e.g. Pattamadilok et al, 2007;Ziegler et al, 2004). In respect of speech production, results showed for the first time an effect of orthography on simple picture naming that emerged immediately following the introduction of the spellings of words on the second day, and that persisted in testing on the third day.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Ziegler & Ferrand, 1998). However, while many studies using this approach have reported robust orthographic effects (e.g., Pattamadilok et al, 2007;Ziegler, Ferrand, & Montant, 2004;Ziegler, Petrova, & Ferrand, 2008) others have reported trends that fail to reach significance over items (e.g., Perre & Ziegler, 2008;Ventura, Kolinsky, Pattamadilok, & Morais, 2008;Ventura, Morais, Pattamadilok, & Kolinsky, 2004), a situation that may result from the fact that this evidence is necessarily derived from a between-items comparison in which the introduction of confounding variables is always a risk. Further, while this result has been generalized to semantic categorization and gender decision (Peereman, Dufour, & Burt, 2009), it is unclear whether it holds for tasks that do not involve an explicit decision component.…”
Section: Orthography Influences the Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus far, no clear picture has emerged, however. Although small consistency effects have occasionally been described in tasks requiring the repetition of auditory words Ziegler et al, 2004), in other studies, no effect has been reported (Pattamadilok, Morais, Ventura, & Kolinsky, 2007;Ventura et al, 2004). That there is a lack of converging evidence from different tasks may indicate that the strong consistency effect observed in the lexical decision task follows from particular processes engaged in evaluating the lexical status of the stimuli.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In other words, the speed of recognizing a spoken word depends, in part, on its spelling. This has become known as the orthographic consistency effect (Ziegler and Ferrand, 1998;Pattamadilok et al, 2007;Ziegler et al, 2008;Pattamadilok et al, 2009;Peereman et al, 2009). We investigated the origin of this effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%