1996
DOI: 10.1006/juec.1996.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lock-In Effect of Capital Gains Taxation on Land Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a property tax on rent is generally neutral on land use, capital gains and bequest taxes are not neutral on resource allocation. See Yamazaki (1996Yamazaki ( , 1999.…”
Section: Compensation and Time Inconsistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a property tax on rent is generally neutral on land use, capital gains and bequest taxes are not neutral on resource allocation. See Yamazaki (1996Yamazaki ( , 1999.…”
Section: Compensation and Time Inconsistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now consider the crucial assumptions about the rental market and asset market for land. Like Kanemoto (1992) and Yamazaki (1996), we assume that there is a competitive asset market for land; however, we assume there is no rental market for land and housing. This assumption is accurate for Japan, because of the``Shakuchi Shakka Hou'', mentioned above.…”
Section: A Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This asymmetric taxation of assets causes a distortion in land use only when there is no rental market for land. If there is a rental market, taxes on assets do not distort the equilibrium conditions in the rental market that determine the allocation of land (Iwata et al, 1993 andYamazaki, 1996). Iwata (1977) showed that a rental market for land and housing hardly exists in Japan because of the law on eviction control and rent control, the``Shakuchi Shakka Hou''.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, following logic similar to Yamazaki's (1996) analysis of capital gains tax on development land, for risk-neutral producers the equilibrium value of quota must satisfy: 7 However, in selling the quota the inefficient producer forgoes quota rent with present value [P -C H Q ( Q/n -Q L )]/[1 + r].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asset market equilibrium must be such that there is indifference between (a) selling in year s, and (b) holding off the sale for a year, receiving a rent due to the ownership of quota for the production in the intervening year, hoping that supply control is not disbanded during the year, and then selling the quota in year s + 1. Therefore, following logic similar to Yamazaki's (1996) analysis of capital gains tax on development land, for risk-neutral producers the equilibrium value of quota must satisfy:…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%