2008
DOI: 10.1002/gea.20221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The location of specialized copper production by the lost wax technique in the Chalcolithic southern Levant

Abstract: The origins of southern Levantine Chalcolithic copper metallurgy have been debated for decades. Typological and metallurgical examinations of the copper artifacts from the Nahal Mishmar hoard and elsewhere have indicated a dichotomy between simple tools, made of pure copper by open casting, and elaborate items made by the "lost wax" technique of copper alloys with arsenic, antimony, and nickel. While the first were considered local production of the northern Negev sites, the prestige objects were either consid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although cornets are rare or absent in the Beer Sheva area, where evidence for copper industry was found (Levy, 1987;Perrot, 1955;Shugar, 2000), it should be emphasized that no evidence for casting by the lost wax technique was observed in these sites, Open casting seemed to be the normal practice. A recent provenance study of the mould remains that were still attached to nearly 80 objects cast by the lost wax technique, including many from the Nahal Mishmar hoard, was able to link the production area of these items with the Judean Desert area (Goren, 2008). This study also demonstrated the possible archaeological invisibility of this technique in sites where regular excavation methods were applied with no use of modern micromorphological, mineralogical or chemical analyses of their sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although cornets are rare or absent in the Beer Sheva area, where evidence for copper industry was found (Levy, 1987;Perrot, 1955;Shugar, 2000), it should be emphasized that no evidence for casting by the lost wax technique was observed in these sites, Open casting seemed to be the normal practice. A recent provenance study of the mould remains that were still attached to nearly 80 objects cast by the lost wax technique, including many from the Nahal Mishmar hoard, was able to link the production area of these items with the Judean Desert area (Goren, 2008). This study also demonstrated the possible archaeological invisibility of this technique in sites where regular excavation methods were applied with no use of modern micromorphological, mineralogical or chemical analyses of their sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The analytical approach was constrained by the scarce amount of preserved casting ceramics, that were available for sampling (Figure b). For example, this precluded the application of ceramic petrography, which has been applied in former studies on casting ceramics (Reedy ; Lombardi & Vidale, ; Schneider ; Goren ; Lombardi ). Therefore, this investigation of provenance follows an alternative approach based mainly on the examination of the trace element composition of the casting ceramics (Holmes & Harbottle, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eldar and Baumgarten 1985, Namdar et al 2004, Shalev et al 1992, Shalev and Northover 1987). Goren's (2008) recent suggestion that a copper industry operated in the En Gedi shrine or nearby cannot be supported since no metallurgical remains were recovered there.…”
Section: Technology and Iconography Of Ghassulian Metal Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This explanation seems only partial. The extensive casting techniques used by Ghassulian metalworking, including lost wax technique in which many elaborately decorated objects are made, as well as use of pure copper for casting in open or two-part molds and complex metals for lost wax technique (Goren 2008, Shalev 1991, demonstrate that Ghassulian copper workers were well aware of the properties of the materials they were using, and of the methods to process them. It is not that they were technically unable to produce copper axe without the image of ropes.…”
Section: Skeuomorphism Boundary Objects and Socialization Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%