2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10543-005-2645-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Local Linearization Method for Numerical Integration of Random Differential Equations

Abstract: A Local Linearization (LL) method for the numerical integration of Random Differential Equations (RDE) is introduced. The classical LL approach is adapted to this type of equations, which are defined by random vector fields that are typically at most Hölder continuous with respect to the time argument. The order of strong convergence of the method is studied. It turns out that the LL method improves the order of convergence of conventional numerical methods that have been applied to RDEs. Additionally, the per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The local linearization method (LL) for RODEs was proposed by Carbonell et al [3], where its discretization error was analyzed. In our context the LL scheme has the form…”
Section: The Local Linearization Scheme For Rodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local linearization method (LL) for RODEs was proposed by Carbonell et al [3], where its discretization error was analyzed. In our context the LL scheme has the form…”
Section: The Local Linearization Scheme For Rodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, a suitable approximation of the stochastic processes present in the random equation, together with the local linearization technique and an adapted Padé method with scaling and squaring strategy are conveniently combined. In this way a higher order of convergence can be achieved (independent of the moduli of continuity of the stochastic processes) while retaining the dynamical and numerical stability properties of the low order LL methods proposed in [3] and with a suitable computational effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular high accuracy, computational efficiency, and stability of the numerical schemes, are very desirable properties. Taking all this into consideration, some numerical integrator have been proposed in literature e.g., [2], [6], [8], [3]. However, these methods or are of implicit nature (involving the numerical solution of a system of nonlinear algebraic equations at each integration step, that typically increase the computational effort of these numerical integrators) or are explicit integrators, having the appealing feature of retaining the standard order of convergence of the classical deterministic schemes, but at the expense of high computational cost and low stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adicionalmente, permite integrar ciertos tipos de ecuaciones "stiff" con menor costo computacional y mejor precisión que los integradores explícitos convencionales. Otra característica ventajosa del método LL es la flexibilidad de su aplicación a otras clases de ecuaciones diferenciales más complejas como por ejemplo las ecuaciones diferenciales estocásticas [8,2], las aleatorias [3] y las ecuaciones con retardo [17].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified