2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41424-9_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Local Langlands Conjectures for Non-quasi-split Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let ๐œ† ๐‘ง be the character corresponding to the class of z under the Tate-Nakayama isomorphism Proof. Both of these statements follow from [Kal16a,Conjecture G]. For the independence of Whittaker datum, one can prove that the validity of this conjecture implies that if ๐”ด is replaced by another choice ๐”ด , then there is an explicitly constructed character (๐”ด, ๐”ด ) of ๐œ‹ 0 (๐‘† ๐œ™ /๐‘ ( ๐บ) ฮ“ ) whose inflation to ๐œ‹ 0 (๐‘† + ๐œ™ ) satisfies ๐œ ๐‘ง,๐”ด, ๐œŽ = ๐œ ๐‘ง,๐”ด , ๐œŽ โŠ— (๐”ด, ๐”ด ) for any ๐œŽ โˆˆ ฮ  ๐œ™ (๐บ) โˆชฮ  ๐œ™ (๐บ ๐‘ ).…”
Section: Construction Of ๐œน ๐…๐† In the General Casementioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let ๐œ† ๐‘ง be the character corresponding to the class of z under the Tate-Nakayama isomorphism Proof. Both of these statements follow from [Kal16a,Conjecture G]. For the independence of Whittaker datum, one can prove that the validity of this conjecture implies that if ๐”ด is replaced by another choice ๐”ด , then there is an explicitly constructed character (๐”ด, ๐”ด ) of ๐œ‹ 0 (๐‘† ๐œ™ /๐‘ ( ๐บ) ฮ“ ) whose inflation to ๐œ‹ 0 (๐‘† + ๐œ™ ) satisfies ๐œ ๐‘ง,๐”ด, ๐œŽ = ๐œ ๐‘ง,๐”ด , ๐œŽ โŠ— (๐”ด, ๐”ด ) for any ๐œŽ โˆˆ ฮ  ๐œ™ (๐บ) โˆชฮ  ๐œ™ (๐บ ๐‘ ).…”
Section: Construction Of ๐œน ๐…๐† In the General Casementioning
confidence: 89%
“…We now drop the assumption that G is a B-inner form of ๐บ In order to make this precise, we will need the material of [Kal16b] and [Kal18], some of which is summarized in [Kal16a]. First, we will need the cohomology set ๐ป 1 (๐‘ข โ†’ ๐‘Š, ๐‘ โ†’ ๐บ * ) defined in [Kal16b,ยง3] for any finite central subgroup ๐‘ โŠ‚ ๐บ * defined over F. As in [Kal18, ยง3.2], it will be convenient to package these sets for varying Z into the single set…”
Section: Construction Of ๐œน ๐…๐† In the General Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…from section 2.1. We now wish to put this local Langlands correspondence for the inner form in the context of the refined local Langlands correspondence of Kaletha [Kal16]. We consider the Kottwitz set B(G) [Kot85; RR96] and let b โˆˆ B(G) be the basic element whose associated ฯƒ-centralizer J b = J.…”
Section: Theorem 22 [Gt14]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of applying the weak form of the Kottwitz Conjecture proven in Hansen-Kaletha-Weinstein [HKW21], we formulate this correspondence in terms of the refined local Langlands of Kaletha [Kal16] with respect to the fixed choice of Whittaker datum m. Now, given a parameter ฯ† that is either mixed supercuspidal or supercuspidal, we have by Theorem 2.1 (2) a correspondence between the L-packet ฮ  ฯ† (G) and the set of irreducible characters A โˆจ ฯ† . This in turn gives rise to an irreducible character of the group S ฯ† via the composition:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%