1970
DOI: 10.5254/1.3547282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Load Dependence of Laboratory Abrasion and Tire Wear

Abstract: The first outcome of this investigation is that non-proportionality between sliding abrasion and load has relatively little effect on the load dependence of tire wear, which is almost entirely governed by the load dependence of the contact length, unless the inflation pressure is very low. The modified theory on the wear of slipping wheels predicts near proportionality at constant slip between wear in crab walk and side force. This relation is useful for test procedures and has been qualitatively confirmed by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of normal load is less pronounced compared to the influence of speed. This corresponds with Schallamach and Grosch who showed that the proportionality of the friction coefficient to the normal load is of a power − 1/3 for a smooth surface to − 1/9 for a rough one [54,55]: so the effect is limited than speed. Moreover, the larger load also decreased the R e in Eq.…”
Section: Visual Comparisons Between Road and Laboratorysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The effect of normal load is less pronounced compared to the influence of speed. This corresponds with Schallamach and Grosch who showed that the proportionality of the friction coefficient to the normal load is of a power − 1/3 for a smooth surface to − 1/9 for a rough one [54,55]: so the effect is limited than speed. Moreover, the larger load also decreased the R e in Eq.…”
Section: Visual Comparisons Between Road and Laboratorysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Table depicts the variation of volume losses of Akron abrasion of the different SBR vulcanizates. The SBR/VPR/clay nanocomposite was much more effective to enhance the abrasion resistance, and abrasion loss is only 0.15 cm −3 , which is adequate for application in the rubber industry .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…where H is the material hardness and K is the wear factor. However, Grosch and Schallamach 10 found that the rubber wear rate is not simply a linear function of normal load, or nominal pressure denoted by 0 , but a nonlinear function of the nominal pressure written as…”
Section: Rubber Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in general, the relationship between wear rate and friction does not obey a simple rule, and it depends on different parameters such as environmental conditions, e.g. temperature and humidity, 9 and operating condition such as normal load, 10 velocity, 11 and the topography of contact surfaces. Moreover, in some conditions, there is no direct relationship between friction and wear, and they behave oppositely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation