2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The little-studied cluster Berkeley 90 – III. Cluster parameters

Abstract: The open cluster Berkeley 90 is the home to one of the most massive binary systems in the Galaxy, LS III +46 • 11, formed by two identical, very massive stars (O3.5 If* + O3.5 If*), and a second early-O system (LS III +46 • 12 with an O4.5 IV((f)) component at least). Stars with spectral types earlier than O4 are very scarce in the Milky Way, with no more than 20 examples. The formation of such massive stars is still an open question today, and thus the study of the environments where the most massive stars ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gaia DR2 distance to Berkeley 90 of ∼3 kpc is somewhat longer than the two early estimates by Mayer & Macák (1973) and Motch et al (1997) but consistent with the more recent values of Maíz Apellániz et al (2015a) and Marco & Negueruela (2017), especially the former. As with most groups in this paper, our distance agrees with the Cantat-Gaudin et al ( 2018) value but with a much larger uncertainty caused by the covariance term.…”
Section: Villafranca O-010 = Ngc 6193 = Rcw 108supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Gaia DR2 distance to Berkeley 90 of ∼3 kpc is somewhat longer than the two early estimates by Mayer & Macák (1973) and Motch et al (1997) but consistent with the more recent values of Maíz Apellániz et al (2015a) and Marco & Negueruela (2017), especially the former. As with most groups in this paper, our distance agrees with the Cantat-Gaudin et al ( 2018) value but with a much larger uncertainty caused by the covariance term.…”
Section: Villafranca O-010 = Ngc 6193 = Rcw 108supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The Gaia DR2 parallax of LS III +46 12 is compatible with that of the cluster, which according to the discussion in Maíz Apellániz et al (2015a) indicates that the star is overluminous for its spectral type or that it is a yet undetected binary. We confirm that the B8 III star 2MASS J20352201+4651518, the B9 III star 2MASS J20352097+4648368, the F6 V star 2MASS J20350745+4651367, the F6 III star 2MASS J20351813+ 4650525, the F8 IV star 2MASS J20350955+4652199, and the G2 III star 2MASS J20351026+4651364 are foreground objects according to their parallaxes and have proper motions significantly different to that of the cluster (Marco & Negueruela 2017).…”
Section: Villafranca O-010 = Ngc 6193 = Rcw 108supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this group it is worth mentioning three stars. 2MASS J20350798+4649321 was classified as O8 V by Marco & Negueruela (2017), who noted that its IPHAS photometry indicated Hα emission. In our blue violet spectrum (Fig.…”
Section: Villafranca O-011 = Berkeley 90mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we take all the stars with these spectral types in the GOSC v3 (Maíz Apellániz et al 2013), we find 20 objects. Of these, 14 lie inside or close to some of the most massive clusters in the Milky Way, but four are in smaller clusters (M cl ∼ 10 3 M ) and two appear in relative isolation within active star formation regions (Marco & Negueruela 2017). Taken at face value, this distribution seems to support the stochastic scenario, but we must exercise caution when interpreting such data.…”
Section: Constraints On High-mass Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%