The Oxford Critical and Cultural History of Modernist Magazines 2012
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199545810.003.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Little Review (1914–29)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality remained somewhat atypical in the Little Review around this time, where even if evaluation was expected, the use of quotation to support a specific claim about an author's style was not the norm. But the observable shift in method nevertheless aided the 'ongoing and often heated conversation about modernism' that took place within the Little Review, 17 and it anticipated the new 'Discussion' section that featured critical reviews from May 1919 to March 1921. In the Little Review, as elsewhere, the project of evaluating new writing publicly in print involved different methods of recording readers' private evaluations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality remained somewhat atypical in the Little Review around this time, where even if evaluation was expected, the use of quotation to support a specific claim about an author's style was not the norm. But the observable shift in method nevertheless aided the 'ongoing and often heated conversation about modernism' that took place within the Little Review, 17 and it anticipated the new 'Discussion' section that featured critical reviews from May 1919 to March 1921. In the Little Review, as elsewhere, the project of evaluating new writing publicly in print involved different methods of recording readers' private evaluations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%