The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1928784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Listing and Delisting of German Firms on NYSE and NASDAQ: Were There Any Benefits?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, firms face different trade-offs in their delisting decision depending on the type of voluntary delisting and whether or not they will continue trading afterwards (Bessler, Kaen, & Kurmann, 2012;Chaplinsky & Ramchand, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Review Voluntary Delistingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, firms face different trade-offs in their delisting decision depending on the type of voluntary delisting and whether or not they will continue trading afterwards (Bessler, Kaen, & Kurmann, 2012;Chaplinsky & Ramchand, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Review Voluntary Delistingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United States has its legal origin in common law, with investor protection being among the best in the world (Berk & DeMarzo, 2006). In the same vein, Bessler, Kaen, Kurmann & Zimmermann (2012) emphasize that, in the US, the corporate and legal governance system is superior, protects minority shareholders, ensures transparency of financial reporting, and reduces managers' ability to derive private benefits.…”
Section: Conclusion and Contributions Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, while the cost and complexity of complying with US capital market regulations increased after the application of SOX, foreign firms' domestic markets developed and improved their governance over time, narrowing the competitive gap between the markets. Bessler et al (2012) highlight that the introduction of SOX in the USA, combined with improvement in German corporate governance laws and the emergence of alternative trading platforms, are the main reasons for German firms' delisting from the US markets. Gao et al (2013) and Doidge et al (2015) challenge the 'SOX cost hypothesis' as an explanation for the falling number of US IPOs.…”
Section: Compliance Versus Non-compliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bessler et al . () highlight that the introduction of SOX in the USA, combined with improvement in German corporate governance laws and the emergence of alternative trading platforms, are the main reasons for German firms’ delisting from the US markets.…”
Section: Reasons For Voluntary Delistingmentioning
confidence: 99%