The Lisbon Treaty

Piris, Jean-Claude; Merkel, Angela

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511762529

Cited by 234 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This Federatio scenario is most similar toFossum's (2021: 32-39) 'Model III: Federal union' constitutional model. This scenario corresponds to the argument of former Director-General of the Legal Service of the Council of Ministers, Jean-ClaudePiris (2010). He argues that the EU remains a 'partially federal entity' in that the EU is neither a classic intergovernmental organisation, nor a state.…”

mentioning

confidence: 64%

Achieving European Communion in the Planetary Organic Crisis: How Dominance and Differentiation affects the sharing of Genuine Democracy

Manners¹

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 64%

Achieving European Communion in the Planetary Organic Crisis: How Dominance and Differentiation affects the sharing of Genuine Democracy

Manners¹

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Уговор из Лисабона 3 донио је значајне измјене у правној и институционалној организацији Европске уније, међу којима је свакако најзначајнија она која се односи на престанак самосталне егзистенције Европске заједнице и њено "утапање" у реформисану "депиларизовану" Унију. Уклањањем стубовне структуре Уније, нестала је и диференцираност полицијске и правосудне сарадње на грађански и кривично-правни дио, те њихова релативно самостална егзистанција у засебним уговорним актима (Piris, 2010).…”

Section: уговор из лисабонаunclassified

The institute of enhanced cooperation in European Union Law: Expectations and achieved results

Tučić,

Dragišić

2023

Zb Pravnog fak Niš

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Institute of Enhanced Cooperation (EnC) was introduced by the Treaty of Amsterdam (1997) but it was made more flexible and operational by the Treaty of Lisbon (2007). Its main objective was to overcome the blockages in the law-making process, as well as to strengthen the cooperation among EU member states and deepen the integration process in specific areas. In this paper, the authors examine the institute of enhanced cooperation as a form of flexible and differentiated integration. The authors first present a brief historical overview of the legal regulation of this institute in the provisions of the founding treaties of the EU. Then, they provide an overview of the sources of law adopted within the framework of enhanced cooperation in certain areas of Private International Law, and particularly for the purpose of establishing the European Public Prosecutor's Office. Based on the analysis of a number of legal acts adopted within this institute, the authors draw a conclusion that the institute of enhanced cooperation has only partially justified its contractually defined role. Viewed from the perspective of the legal order of the European Union as a whole, this institute requires special attention due to the particularities of its application, which ultimately entails different solutions in the EU member states on certain issues of particular importance for legal and natural persons in the Union. There is no doubt that this institute provides many opportunities to the EU member states in terms of realizing or deepening their cooperation in certain issues, particularly if it is perceived as a stage on the way to establishing general, common rules for all member states. However, its application may challenge the unity and the integral structure of the EU legal order. It may also be inconsistent with some of the basic EU legal principles which have been continuously strengthened and expanded by the Court of Justice of the EU. Above all, it refers to the principle of unity of the legal order, the principle of prohibition of discrimination on the basis of citizenship, and the principle of legal certainty.

show abstract

“…2789 at 31). However, academics have argued that Article 2 values are legally binding (Scheppele et al, 2021) and references therein, for instance: Pech et al, 2016, 200;Hillion, 2016;Kochenov and Pech, 2016); Scheppele, 2016;Piris, 2010), and must be more than non-binding assertions, because they are given weight by Article 7 TEU, which permits investigation of, and political action against, states for breaches of Article 2 values. The European Commission is given power to initiate the Article 7 process and make recommendations to the EU institutions.…”

Section: The Legal Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The European Commission and minority rights

2022

Fundamental Rights and Racial and Cultural Minorities in the EU: Carving Out a Mandate to Protect 'Others'

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

She publishes on the protection of human rights of minorities and other vulnerable persons, combining domestic, European and international perspectives on these issues. She is the author of the book 'The 10 See for instance, a review of the anti-discrimination legislation: European Commission (2021) 11 https://www.antiracism-eusummit2021.eu/ 12 https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/item-detail.cfm?item_id=51025 13 https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-andxenophobia/eu-code-conduct-countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_en

show abstract

The Lisbon Treaty

Cited by 234 publications

References 19 publications

Achieving European Communion in the Planetary Organic Crisis: How Dominance and Differentiation affects the sharing of Genuine Democracy

Achieving European Communion in the Planetary Organic Crisis: How Dominance and Differentiation affects the sharing of Genuine Democracy

The institute of enhanced cooperation in European Union Law: Expectations and achieved results

The European Commission and minority rights

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About