2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51184-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The link between yeast cell wall porosity and plasma membrane permeability after PEF treatment

Abstract: An investigation of the yeast cell resealing process was performed by studying the absorption of the tetraphenylphosphonium (TPP+) ion by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It was shown that the main barrier for the uptake of such TPP+ ions is the cell wall. An increased rate of TPP+ absorption after treatment of such cells with a pulsed electric field (PEF) was observed only in intact cells, but not in spheroplasts. The investigation of the uptake of TPP+ in PEF treated cells exposed to TPP+ for different ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure, vacuum, and electric fields. To our knowledge, to date, only a handful of reports have used high pressures for encapsulation, which may be beneficial due to the induction of pores in the cell wall, as has been shown for shear forces or short pulsed electric field (PEF) [ 136 ]. However, there appears to be no conclusive evidence of improvements in encapsulation efficiency through the application of high pressure: Shi et al used high pressures (25 MPa, 40 °C, 4 h) for chlorogenic acid [ 27 ] or resveratrol [ 29 ]), but no control at room pressure was employed; Errenst et al employed a high pressure system where a limonene/water emulsion in CO 2 was mixed with yeast carried by a nitrogen stream [ 94 ], but there the high pressure was an integral component of their process (=no control at low pressure would be possible).…”
Section: The Controlling Variables Of Passive Encapsulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure, vacuum, and electric fields. To our knowledge, to date, only a handful of reports have used high pressures for encapsulation, which may be beneficial due to the induction of pores in the cell wall, as has been shown for shear forces or short pulsed electric field (PEF) [ 136 ]. However, there appears to be no conclusive evidence of improvements in encapsulation efficiency through the application of high pressure: Shi et al used high pressures (25 MPa, 40 °C, 4 h) for chlorogenic acid [ 27 ] or resveratrol [ 29 ]), but no control at room pressure was employed; Errenst et al employed a high pressure system where a limonene/water emulsion in CO 2 was mixed with yeast carried by a nitrogen stream [ 94 ], but there the high pressure was an integral component of their process (=no control at low pressure would be possible).…”
Section: The Controlling Variables Of Passive Encapsulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such pulses are likely to increase the permeability of plasma membrane with a minor impact on the viability. Some lethal effects of pulsed electric field on yeast cells, like irreversible permeabilization or activation of metacaspases, were investigated and discussed previously [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was evaluated by employing membrane-impermeable fluorescent dyes intercalated into nucleic acids. Greater amounts of intracellular dye resulted in greater fluorescence intensity (FI), corresponding to the increased permeability [36]. It was found that both pulses (the electric field strength was 26 kV/cm) generated with and without the crowbar circuit induced electroporation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%