2011
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2011.174.3.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The link between the shape of the irrational Aubry-Mather sets and their Lyapunov exponents

Abstract: We consider the irrational Aubry-Mather sets of an exact symplectic monotone C 1 twist map of the two-dimensional annulus, introduce for them a notion of "C 1 -regularity" (related to the notion of Bouligand paratingent cone) and prove that • a Mather measure has zero Lyapunov exponents if and only if its support is C 1 -regular almost everywhere;

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic idea is based on the following dichotomy for Green bundles: either they are always transverse, in which case one gets hyperbolicity of the Aubry set; or the Green bundles coincide along a given orbit of the Aubry set, and in this latter case, elaborating on previous works by Arnaud [4,5], we show that the restriction to the projected Aubry set of any critical solution is C 2 along the projected orbit. This additional regularity property is not enough to apply the techniques which were introduced in [19,20], since there the authors had to require the existence of a critical solution which is C 1,1 in a neighborhood of the projected orbit and C 2 along it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic idea is based on the following dichotomy for Green bundles: either they are always transverse, in which case one gets hyperbolicity of the Aubry set; or the Green bundles coincide along a given orbit of the Aubry set, and in this latter case, elaborating on previous works by Arnaud [4,5], we show that the restriction to the projected Aubry set of any critical solution is C 2 along the projected orbit. This additional regularity property is not enough to apply the techniques which were introduced in [19,20], since there the authors had to require the existence of a critical solution which is C 1,1 in a neighborhood of the projected orbit and C 2 along it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The present section is inspired by ideas and techniques developed by Arnaud in [4,5], and by the last two authors in [20]. Let S ⊂ R k be a compact set which has the origin as a cluster point.…”
Section: Paratingent Cones and Green Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above theorem, the generalized Hessian of u at x x depends upon the Riemannian metric g. However, it is worth noticing that assumption (iii) does not depend on the metric g. Such an assumption is motivated by some recent results of Arnaud [3][4][5]. Let us also point out that, since the graph of du is invariant under the Hamiltonian flow in V, assumption (iii) implies that H ess g x u is a singleton for any x 2 O C .x x/.…”
Section: Statement Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What the theory of [2] tells us is that x → df x in this case cannot be the the restriction of a C 1 section of T * T 2 . Already from Mather's theory [21] (or from Theorem 12) we know that it must be Lipschitz, and the question remains as to whether it is something in-between.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory developed in [2] can be adapted to analyze the regularity of supp µ. That theory is about maps on the annulus S 1 × R. To adapt it, take a smooth circle β ⊂ M transversal to restriction of the geodesic flow determined by supp µ, and look at the map φ : T β → T β determined by the first-return map of that flow.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%