The Link Between Responsibility and Legitimacy: The Case of De Beers in Namibia

Abstract

This article investigates the link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and the reasons for which legitimacy is ascribed or denied. It fills a gap in the literature on CSR and legitimacy that lacks empirical studies regarding the question whether CSR contributes to organisational legitimacy. The problem is discussed by referring to the case of De Beers's diamond mining partnership with the Government of Namibia. A total of 42 interviews were conducted-41 with stakeholders and one with the focal organisation Namdeb. The 41 stakeholder interviews are analysed with regard to cognitive, pragmatic and moral legitimacy as defined by Suchman (Acad Manage Rev 20(3):571-610, 1995). The main finding is that the majority of statements on organisational legitimacy refer to moral legitimacy and most issues raised in this context challenge the company's legitimacy despite its comprehensive CSR engagement. The study demonstrates that legitimacy gaps can be a result of communication practices that raise unrealistic stakeholder expectations and that the legitimacy gained by CSR engagement in one area cannot substitute legitimacy losses caused by failures in another.

The online presence of Turkish banks: Communicating the softer side of corporate identity

“…In fact, there is increased concern about the organizations' added value to the society not just financial but also the non-financial benefits (Pfeffer & Salancik, 1978). As Claasen and Roloff (2011) argued, an influential way to gain legitimacy is making CSR practices highly visible through an organization's communication efforts.…”

CSR and Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of the European Union

“…The result is a credibility gap (Dando & Swift, 2003) between companies and stakeholders with regard to CSR reporting. This gap has led stakeholders to Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy | 341 Vol.5 (2017) no.3, pp.335-354;www.managementdynamics.ro question the moral legitimacy of corporations in society (Claasen & Roloff, 2012).…”

Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in an Emerging Economy: Through the Lens of Legitimacy Theory

“…While there is no generally accepted theory for explaining CSER practices, recent research in the CSR literature has relied heavily on legitimacy theory (for example, Branco & Rodrigues, 2008;Claasen & Roloff, 2012). According to Gray (1995a), legitimacy theory has an advantage over other theories in that it provides disclosing strategies that organisations may adopt to legitimate their existence that may be empirically tested.…”

“…"The social responsibility of business encompasses the economic, legal, ethical and discretionary expectations that a society has of organizations at a given point in time." Competing definitions tried to be more specific by emphasising the voluntary character of corporate social responsibility and linking it, thus, more strongly to ethical and philanthropic responsibilities than to economic and legal ones (Claasen & Roloff, 2012). The European Union defines corporate social responsibility as "a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis".…”