2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2015.11.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lindley paradox in optical interferometry

Abstract: The so-called Lindley paradox is a counterintuitive statistical effect where the Bayesian and frequentist approaches to hypothesis testing give radically different answers, depending on the choice of the prior distribution. In this paper we address the occurrence of the Lindley paradox in optical interferometry and discuss its implications for high-precision measurements. In particular, we focus on phase estimation by Mach-Zehnder interferometers and show how to mitigate the conflict between the two approaches… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of the Bayes factor to the choice of increasingly diffuse priors is well known and often referred to as Lindley's paradox [61,62]. It is illustrated for instance in [63] for an example of a Gaussian likelihood with unknown mean θ and unknown variance σ 2 where a Normal(0,τ 2 ) prior is put on the variance parameter σ 2 . With increasing τ 2 , the marginal likelihood of the null model θ = θ 0 and that of the alternative will converge to 1 and zero, respectively, no matter the value of the data.…”
Section: Jcap02(2023)056mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the Bayes factor to the choice of increasingly diffuse priors is well known and often referred to as Lindley's paradox [61,62]. It is illustrated for instance in [63] for an example of a Gaussian likelihood with unknown mean θ and unknown variance σ 2 where a Normal(0,τ 2 ) prior is put on the variance parameter σ 2 . With increasing τ 2 , the marginal likelihood of the null model θ = θ 0 and that of the alternative will converge to 1 and zero, respectively, no matter the value of the data.…”
Section: Jcap02(2023)056mentioning
confidence: 99%