1967
DOI: 10.21236/ad0661577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lincoln Experimental Terminal

Abstract: LEXINGTON MASSACHUSETTSThis report is a description of selected portions of the system emphasizing the most novel features. The first chapter gives a general description of LET-1 as a whole, and the second an over-all description of the signal processing system. Chapter 3 discusses the equipmental realization of the signal processing system and Chapter 4 the utilization of a general-purpose computer as an element of the signal processing system. Chapters 5 and 6 treat two specific subsystems: the sequential de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows a typical oil/water relative permeability curves for the four core flooding experiments by seawater. The characteristic of curves represents the weakly oil-wet or mixed-wet system because the value of water saturation at a cross point is less than 50% of water saturation for all tests, , which indicated that the selected Corey exponents to water/oil system are reasonable. The relative permeabilities at residual oil saturation ( S or ) or the maximum water saturation ( S w(max) ) for four water flooding experiments indicate successful water flooding experiments.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Figure shows a typical oil/water relative permeability curves for the four core flooding experiments by seawater. The characteristic of curves represents the weakly oil-wet or mixed-wet system because the value of water saturation at a cross point is less than 50% of water saturation for all tests, , which indicated that the selected Corey exponents to water/oil system are reasonable. The relative permeabilities at residual oil saturation ( S or ) or the maximum water saturation ( S w(max) ) for four water flooding experiments indicate successful water flooding experiments.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The water alternative gas (WAG) method was introduced in 1987, and the main idea of using this EOR method was to combine primary water flooding and gas injection to increase ultimate recovery . Increasing sweep efficiency up to 10% in the WAG method was the main reason for using this method in a number of laboratory and field studies, such as Stafjord. , Moreover, laboratory experiments were shown that the WAG method had better performance, and it is known as a cost-effective method in comparison to the gas injection method, especially in heterogeneous reservoirs. − The main reasons for using the WAG method are preventing fingering issues, lowering the mobility ratio, and improving interfacial and wettability conditions. − We did a comprehensive study on different EOR scenarios, such as water/hot water and WAG (water, hot water, N 2 , CO 2 , and associated gas), and it was found that performing the WAG test with associated gas had the best values with regard to ultimate oil recovery and breakthrough time . Chemically enhanced WAG was introduced as an EOR method using different methods such as surfactant, polymer, and alkaline flooding, , and the main notion for using these methods was to solve the water blocking problem in routine WAG tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water displaces oil from the pore space, and the efficacy of the displacement depends on many factors. 1 The key petrophysical properties include porosity, permeability, water and oil saturations, pore structure, etc. Decades of waterflooding treatments inevitably change the petrophysical properties of a reservoir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%