The Limits of Superpower: The United States and the Soviet Union since World War II

Abstract

Superpowers are of critical importance in the regulation of global affairs. Since World War II, the U.S. and the Soviet Union imposed a bipolar order that had worldwide repercussions. Now that the Cold War has ended and the Soviet Union has disintegrated, the eyes of the world are on the US., as the sole remaining superpower and on its role in the "new world order." While there is an abundance of studies concerned with superpowers, very few deal both theoretically and empirically with the interrelationship between the superpowers and their global political environment. This article provides a general theoretical framework for studying the interrelationships between superpowers and their political environments, presents an empirical analysis that covers the Cold War era from 1948-88, and discusses the findings in the light of current debates about U.S. unilateralism in the post-Cold War world. The global political environment functioned as an arena for U S -Soviet competition but at the same time imposed limits on superpower. Third countries, instead of being mere pawns in the superpower contest, became increasingly influential and destabilized the superpower relationship. One of the consequences was that periods of detente could not be sustained. After the Cold War, the U.S. is faced with its own relative decline and slipping control of the global political environment.

A geopolítica anticolonial na transescalaridade da luta indígena

“…Como resultado do levantamento bibliográfico temos como exemplo de geopolítica estadocrítica, também ordenado cronologicamente, Castro (1946Castro ( , 1951, Gottmann (1952Gottmann ( , 1961, Cohen (1973), Lacoste (1976), Sodré (1976), O'Loughlin (1986), Becker (1988Becker ( , 1995, Andrade (1989), Nijman (1992), Ó Tuathail e Agnew (1992), Corbridge (1994), Ó Tuathail (1996, Agnew (2002), Horta (2006), Bomfim (2010) e Monteiro (2021).…”

“…-Análise sobre o Estado numa perspectiva crítica de sua atuação; -Engloba outros agentes, como grandes corporações privadas e Organizações Não-Governamentais. Castro (1946Castro ( , 1951, Gottmann (1952Gottmann ( , 1961, Cohen (1973), Lacoste (1976), Sodré (1976), O'Loughlin (1986), Becker (1988Becker ( , 1995, Andrade (1989), Nijman (1992), Ó Tuathail e Agnew (1992), Corbridge (1994), Ó Tuathail (1996), Agnew (2002), Horta (2006), Ribeiro (2008, Bomfim (2010), Souza (2015Souza ( , 2019, Monteiro (2021).…”

2. Theories and Models: Understanding and Predicting Societal Collapse

“…25 In recent history, the possibility of collapse via this competitive route has notable examples, such as the collapse of the Soviet Union in competition with the US. 26 While appealing in its simplicity and the identification of a 'smoking gun' for collapse, this class of arguments misses an important point. Throughout its history, any given society has likely encountered many external threats, such as competition with several other societies on economic terms or, more directly, as conflict and warfare.…”

Geopolitics of Religion: How Does Religion Influence International Relations and States’ Foreign Policies?

“…The U.S and Russia (successor of the Soviet Union) emerged as global superpowers after the World War II period. This emergence not only set in motion the events under which the Cold War transpired but brought about the clash of the two opposing ideologies known as Capitalism and Communism (Nijman, 1992). The two superpowers set up their political presence through adopting a number of policies including those made part of "Hard Power" and those made part of "Soft Power" for extending their sphere of influence wherever their national interests exist.…”