2022
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.803393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limits of Sharenting: Exploring Parents’ and Adolescents’ Sharenting Boundaries Through the Lens of Communication Privacy Management Theory

Abstract: Parents sharing information about their children on social network sites (SNSs) (i.e., sharenting) is common today. However, previous work confronting parents’ and adolescents’ views on sharenting and related privacy concerns is limited. Therefore, the present study scrutinizes parents’ motives for sharenting and adolescents’ attitudes toward sharenting and negotiated privacy management strategies. Communication Privacy Management (CPM) was used as a theoretical framework. Based on 30 semi-structured interview… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Lewis et al (2011) examined patient/physician communication about birth control through the lens of CPM and identified both patient characteristics and physician characteristics that determined the permeability of patients’ privacy boundaries. Similarly, Walrave and colleagues (2022) used CPM in their examination of communication boundaries between parents and adolescents related to social media sharing, and identified strategies that parents and adolescents developed to negotiate privacy boundaries and avoid boundary turbulence. Another study using CPM to examine boundary negotiation about what, when and with whom to share information about a lung cancer diagnosis identified the importance of risk benefit analyses to accessing social support (Ngwenya et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lewis et al (2011) examined patient/physician communication about birth control through the lens of CPM and identified both patient characteristics and physician characteristics that determined the permeability of patients’ privacy boundaries. Similarly, Walrave and colleagues (2022) used CPM in their examination of communication boundaries between parents and adolescents related to social media sharing, and identified strategies that parents and adolescents developed to negotiate privacy boundaries and avoid boundary turbulence. Another study using CPM to examine boundary negotiation about what, when and with whom to share information about a lung cancer diagnosis identified the importance of risk benefit analyses to accessing social support (Ngwenya et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has found that 20% of European children’s (aged 12–16) parents or carers shared personal information about them on social media without asking ( Smahel et al, 2020 ). However, some studies also found parents reflecting on the consequences of disclosing personal information about their child ( Cino and Wartella, 2021 ; Walrave et al, 2022 ). Some parents take a critical stance towards sharenting and adapt their behavior by not sharing personal identifiable information of their child or by adopting privacy-protecting strategies when engaging in sharenting ( Ammari et al, 2015 ; Autenrieth, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some parents take a critical stance towards sharenting and adapt their behavior by not sharing personal identifiable information of their child or by adopting privacy-protecting strategies when engaging in sharenting ( Ammari et al, 2015 ; Autenrieth, 2018 ). However, until now, research mainly concentrated on parents’ sharenting motives ( Latipah et al, 2020 ), and on adolescents’ perception of their parents’ motives and behavior ( Lipu and Siibak, 2019 ; Ouvrein and Verswijvel, 2019 ; Verswijvel et al, 2019 ; Walrave et al, 2022 ). Scarce research focused on parents’ critical attitude towards sharenting and its influence on their sharenting behavior as a consequence ( Davidson-Wall, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations