2016
DOI: 10.1002/navi.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limits of In-Run Calibration of MEMS Inertial Sensors and Sensor Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work by [42,43] performs online calibration of all three tri-axial sensors in MIMU. There is however limitations to online approach, as highlighted by [5]. Also the quality and space coverage of the data dictates the calibration accuracy on unseen data [44,45].…”
Section: F In-situ Calibration Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The work by [42,43] performs online calibration of all three tri-axial sensors in MIMU. There is however limitations to online approach, as highlighted by [5]. Also the quality and space coverage of the data dictates the calibration accuracy on unseen data [44,45].…”
Section: F In-situ Calibration Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MEMS accelerometer, rate gyro and magnetometer are not only affected by systematic errors of bias, sensitivity, non-orthogonality and misalignment, but also undergo stochastic errors. The precise calibration of these multi-MIMU systems, remains a major challenge [5]. The computation of a state or latent features from sensor inputs often implies integration over time, like integration of rate gyro readings for orientation estimation or of accelerometer readings for navigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the works [13,14,15,19,21,30] cited above utilized high-end commercial consumer grade MEMS sensors with costs in the order of thousands of US dollars [31], but it is not practical to equip pedestrians with expensive sensors. This type of sensor is designed to provide accurate inertial-based motion tracking [25] with orientation accuracy of 1.5 degrees RMS or less [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, they measure its linear acceleration, angular velocity, and the magnetic field surrounding the sensor. Angular velocity can be numerically integrated to obtain rotation, but MIMUs designed for human motion analysis are based on low-cost microelectromechanical technology that also suffers from substantial noise and bias over the measurement [ 5 ]. This noise and bias particularly affects the angular velocity measure, [ 6 ] such that the estimation of the orientation by numerical integration leads to a well-known error: orientation drift [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%