Proceedings of the Artificial Life Conference 2016 2016
DOI: 10.7551/978-0-262-33936-0-ch039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limits of Decidable States on Open-Ended Evolution and Emergence

Abstract: Is undecidability a requirement for open-ended evolution (OEE)? Using algorithmic complexity theory methods, we propose robust computational definitions for open-ended evolution and adaptability of computable dynamical systems. Within this framework, we show that decidability imposes absolute limits to the growth of complexity on computable dynamical systems up to a double logarithmic term. Conversely, systems that exhibit open-ended evolution must be undecidable, establishing undecidability as a requirement f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Coding Theorem Method (CTM) as an estimator of algorithmic randomness by way of algorithmic probability via the algorithmic Coding theorem (see Supplementary Material) relating causal content and classical probability (38,39). • Logical Depth (LD) as a BDM-based (see below) estimation of logical depth (30), a measure of sophistication that assigns both algorithmically simple and algorithmically random sequences shallow depth, and everything else higher complexity, believed to be related to biological evolution (31,32).…”
Section: • Lossless Compression (Compress)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Coding Theorem Method (CTM) as an estimator of algorithmic randomness by way of algorithmic probability via the algorithmic Coding theorem (see Supplementary Material) relating causal content and classical probability (38,39). • Logical Depth (LD) as a BDM-based (see below) estimation of logical depth (30), a measure of sophistication that assigns both algorithmically simple and algorithmically random sequences shallow depth, and everything else higher complexity, believed to be related to biological evolution (31,32).…”
Section: • Lossless Compression (Compress)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous result [11], we have shown that Chaitin's model exhibits open-ended evolution (OEE [12]) according to a formal definition of OEE as defined in [11] in accordance to the general intuition about OEE, and that no decidable system with computable dynamics can achieve OEE under such computational definition. Here we will introduce a system that, by following the Universal Distribution, optimally approaches OEE.…”
Section: Chaitin's Evolutionary Modelmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This way, submachines will only be those machines for which there is another non-reducibly "bigger" machine that can decide, at least, what is the output of the former and whether there is an output at all. In particular, this condition proved to be necessary in order to build theoretical models for an open-ended 2 [18] evolution of programs in which the very environment, or "Nature", can be simulated in a computer [1]. Note that every machine that falls under this definition always defines an equivalent total Turing machine (with a signed output corresponding to the case where the submachine does not halt); and every total Turing machine falls under this definition.…”
Section: Turing Submachinesmentioning
confidence: 99%