The limits of cultural competence: an Indigenous Studies perspective

Abstract

Taking the Universities Australia report, National best practice framework for Indigenous cultural competency in Australian universities (2011) as the starting point for its discussion, this paper examines the applicability of cultural competence in the design and delivery of Australian Indigenous Studies. It argues that both the conceptual underpinnings and the operationalisation of cultural competence necessitate an over-reliance on essentialised notions of Indigeneity, cast in radical opposition to non-Indigeneity, which negate multiple and diverse expressions of Indigenous identity and lived experience. Thus, this approach perpetuates the very colonialist logics Indigenous Studies should endeavour to overcome. Secondly, it argues that cultural competency's emphasis on non-Indigenous self-reflexivity, broadly consistent as it is with both scholarship and praxis in Indigenous Studies, is represented in some of the literature as uncritical deference to an always-unified Indigeneity, thereby exacerbating the original essentialising impulse evident in the cultural competence paradigm. Therefore, this paper proposes that Indigenous Studies should explore the limits of self-reflexivity, with a view to establishing a genuinely anti-colonial/decolonising praxis that incorporates the capacity to negotiate Indigenous intracultural diversity along with other markers for identity.

Cultural awareness workshops: limitations and practical consequences

“…The undefined outgroup (i.e., the intended target of the workshop) is indirectly (sometimes directly) understood to be Western majority culture or perhaps more pointedly, the White Anglo male. Workshops that accentuate notions of White privilege, structural oppression and power imbalances reinforce this binary [32]. Moreover, instructors occasionally deliver training in a vindictive way, invoking far-reaching social statements (i.e., workplaces are institutionally racist or extensions of colonization; majority culture clinicians are innately privileged and have racial blind-spots).…”

Weaving First Peoples' knowledge into a university course

“…philosophies and worldviews against First Peoples' knowledge and perspectives and enabled the Reference Committee to transform practice itself rather than confirming to 'normal' and established non-Indigenous knowledge and power relationships within higher education (Carlson and McGloin, 2013;Nakata et al, 2014;Carey, 2015).…”

Looking Back to the Potlatch as a Guide to Truth, Reconciliation, and Transformative Learning

“…Confronting the shameful truth of genocidal practices in Canadian history in the classroom includes acknowledging the continued objectification, dehumanization, and commodification of Indigenous Peoples. In an educational context, this type of identification, involving and deep and emotionally laden course content, can challenge the limits of intercultural competence, affinity to trust and the emotional fragility of any teacher, even a very experienced one (Carey ; Herring et al. ; Regan ; Sue et al.…”