2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1202.1317
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limiting Polytope of the Generic Initial System of a Complete Intersection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented here and in [May12a] may lead the reader to believe that the limiting polytope of any symbolic generic initial system is defined by a single hyperplane. The following example shows that this does not hold even for ideals of points in P 2 .…”
Section: Final Examplementioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results presented here and in [May12a] may lead the reader to believe that the limiting polytope of any symbolic generic initial system is defined by a single hyperplane. The following example shows that this does not hold even for ideals of points in P 2 .…”
Section: Final Examplementioning
confidence: 72%
“…We will see that each of the ideals gin(I (m) ) is generated in the variables x and y, so that P gin(I (m) ) , and thus P , can be thought of as a subset of R 2 . One reason for studying the limiting shape of a system of monomial ideals is that it completely determines the asymptotic multiplier ideals of the system (see [How01] and [May12a]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The asymptotic behaviour of a collection of monomial ideals a • such that a i • a j ⊆ a i+j (a graded system of monomial ideals) can be described by its limiting shape P . If P a i denotes the Newton polytope of a i , then the limiting shape P is defined to be the limit lim m→∞ 1 m P am ([May12d]). In addition to giving a simple geometric interpretation of the limiting behaviour, P completely determines the asymptotic multiplier ideals of a • (see [How01]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%