2018
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2018.1484467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limiting normal cone of a complementarity set in Sobolev spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Sobolev or Lebesgue spaces, the limiting normal cone turned out to be not as effective as in finite dimensional spaces for obtaining stationarity conditions for complementaritytype optimization problems, see [Harder, Wachsmuth, 2018;Mehlitz, Wachsmuth, 2018]. Thus, it would be interesting to know whether the new elementary method from this paper can provide ideas for possible approaches for better stationarity conditions of complementarity-type optimization problems in Sobolev and Lebesgue spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Sobolev or Lebesgue spaces, the limiting normal cone turned out to be not as effective as in finite dimensional spaces for obtaining stationarity conditions for complementaritytype optimization problems, see [Harder, Wachsmuth, 2018;Mehlitz, Wachsmuth, 2018]. Thus, it would be interesting to know whether the new elementary method from this paper can provide ideas for possible approaches for better stationarity conditions of complementarity-type optimization problems in Sobolev and Lebesgue spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, convergence of the method to KKT points was shown under validity of a problem-tailored version of asymptotic regularity. As soon as D becomes nonconvex, one has to face some uncomfortable properties of the appearing limiting normal cone which turns out to be comparatively large since weak- * -convergence is used for its definition as a set limit in the dual space, see [33,50]. That it why the associated M-stationarity conditions are, in general, too weak in order to yield a reasonable stationarity condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For limiting normals, an extension to Asplund spaces seems to be possible, directly. Nevertheless, we would like to point the reader's attention to the fact that due to certain convexification effects, limiting normals turned out to be of limited practical use in Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces which are standard in optimal control, see [24,37,38] for a detailed investigation.…”
Section: Remark 34mentioning
confidence: 99%