The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limited role salt marshes may have in buffering extreme storm surge events: Case study on the New Jersey shore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear regression models of LAT19 3 and SC20 2 did not take into consideration that total flood area, flooded wetland area, and total at risk property value have interactions. For example, LAT19 3 suggested that the slope of the wetland width is the wetland value, while SC20 2 developed a formula to calculate the wetland value. However, the assumptions made by them were too simplistic because they calculated the wetland value by replacing the flooded wetland areas with zero but used the same total at risk property value and total flood area corresponding to "with wetlands" results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linear regression models of LAT19 3 and SC20 2 did not take into consideration that total flood area, flooded wetland area, and total at risk property value have interactions. For example, LAT19 3 suggested that the slope of the wetland width is the wetland value, while SC20 2 developed a formula to calculate the wetland value. However, the assumptions made by them were too simplistic because they calculated the wetland value by replacing the flooded wetland areas with zero but used the same total at risk property value and total flood area corresponding to "with wetlands" results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During Superstorm Sandy, coastal wetlands along New Jersey (NJ), New York (NY), and Connecticut (CT) coasts (Fig. 1a) provided a modest reduction of structural loss in coastal communities 1,3,6 due to the relatively sparse and low Spartina marsh and the high storm tide. On the other hand, Sheng et al 7 found that the tall and dense Phragmites-dominated Piermont Marsh buffered the Village of Piermont, located 40 km north (upstream) of New York City (NYC) on the Hudson River, from massive structural loss during Sandy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%