2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1048-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limited importance of size-asymmetric light competition and growth of pioneer species in early secondary forest succession in Vietnam

Abstract: It is generally believed that asymmetric competition for light plays a predominant role in determining the course of succession by increasing size inequalities between plants. Size-related growth is the product of size-related light capture and light-use efficiency (LUE). We have used a canopy model to calculate light capture and photosynthetic rates of pioneer species in sequential vegetation stages of a young secondary forest stand. Growth of the same saplings was followed in time as succession proceeded. Ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher total leaf area per unit plant mass (LAR) of shorter species compensated for their lower light capture per unit leaf area (Hirose & Werger 1995). Similar patterns were observed in very young secondary forest (van Kuijk et al 2008;Selaya et al 2008). These results indicate that size-symmetric competition may occur under one-sided light competition, which clearly contradicts the general notion that light acquisition is by definition size asymmetric (Weiner 1990).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher total leaf area per unit plant mass (LAR) of shorter species compensated for their lower light capture per unit leaf area (Hirose & Werger 1995). Similar patterns were observed in very young secondary forest (van Kuijk et al 2008;Selaya et al 2008). These results indicate that size-symmetric competition may occur under one-sided light competition, which clearly contradicts the general notion that light acquisition is by definition size asymmetric (Weiner 1990).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The lower LUE P in taller individuals was partly due to the saturating nature of light-photosynthesis relationship; photosynthetic rates often saturate at 500-1000 lmol m À2 s À1 PPFD, while the top canopy leaves receive light levels that were higher than this saturation point. Similar studies comparing LUE p among species in very young secondary tropical forests obtained varying results with LUE p either higher in taller than shorter species (Selaya & Anten 2010), or not related to stature (van Kuijk et al 2008). All these studies, however, share two important short-comings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Test statistics on the relationship between neighborhood competition and sapling growth in Table 3 Plant Ecol (2012) 213:25-34 31 2008). Overall growth in the Vietnam site was much slower than in our site and the Bolivian site (van Breugel et al 2006;Kuijk et al 2008;Selaya et al 2008). The intensity and the degree of size-asymmetry in competition may thus, as hypothesized by Schwinning and Weiner (1998) and Wilson (1999), change along a gradient of site productivity.…”
Section: Competition and Successionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, it has also been argued that, even if competition is mediated by light, the degree of asymmetry may differ depending on crown allometry of competing trees and canopy structure of the stand (Kikuzawa and Umeki 1996), which may result from species differences (Uriarte et al 2004(Uriarte et al , 2005Selaya et al 2007;Kuijk et al 2008;Uriarte et al 2010).…”
Section: Symmetry Does Not Necessarily Imply Belowground Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation