The limited impact of indeterminacy for healthcare rationing: how indeterminacy problems show the need for a hybrid theory, but nothing more

Abstract

A notorious debate in the ethics of healthcare rationing concerns whether to address rationing decisions with substantial principles or with a procedural approach. One major argument in favour of procedural approaches is that substantial principles are indeterminate so that we can reasonably disagree about how to apply them. To deal with indeterminacy, we need a just decision process. In this paper I argue that it is a mistake to abandon substantial principles just because they are indeterminate. It is true that reasonable substantial principles designed to deal with healthcare rationing can be expected to be indeterminate. Yet, the indeterminacy is only partial. In some situations we can fully determine what to do in light of the principles, in some situations we cannot. The conclusion to draw from this fact is not that we need to develop procedural approaches to healthcare rationing, but rather that we need a more complex theory in which both substantial principles and procedural approaches are needed.

Psychometric testing of perceived implicit rationing of nursing care (PIRNCA)

“…‘Rationing of care’ or ‘rationed care’ are often used terms in healthcare systems around the world (Jones, 2014). In detail, the phenomenon was described primarily in medical disciplines and was used to refer to resource allocation (Herlitz, 2016; Strech & Danis, 2014; Williams, 1980). Resource allocation illustrates general funds that have implications for labour and material resources that are necessary for providing care to patients.…”

Prioritising, Ranking and Resource Implementation - A Normative Analysis

“…If a condition is severe but with access to moderately effective treatment, and another condition is less severe but there is an unmet need with no access to interventions, how should these be ranked in relation to each other? 17 And fourth, the ranking might be inconsistent. We might not be meticulous enough or allow other concerns such as idiosyncratic personal or professional interests to come into play.…”

Distributing global health resources: Contemporary issues in political philosophy

“…But it is often taken to be a reason to completely abandon substantive principles. We believe this is a mistake since the arguments only show how no theory can be complete (Herlitz, 2016).…”