2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.00057.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limitations of a ‘high‐risk’ approach for the prevention of dental caries

Abstract: The decline in the prevalence of caries has lead several authors to advocate the adoption of a 'high-risk' approach for caries preventive strategies. This paper analyses such an approach. It argues that the distribution of caries within a population follows certain laws: first, the mean caries score is a function of the prevalence; second, the variance is a function of the mean; and third, for a particular mean score, the distribution within the population is predetermined. Using data from the National Prevent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…During recent years, prevention provided by dental health personnel has moved towards a high risk strategy with the limitation that it fails to reach a majority in the population [Batchelor and Sheiham, 2002]. The data from 2002 point to the necessity of preserving and developing population-based strategies for young children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During recent years, prevention provided by dental health personnel has moved towards a high risk strategy with the limitation that it fails to reach a majority in the population [Batchelor and Sheiham, 2002]. The data from 2002 point to the necessity of preserving and developing population-based strategies for young children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in BC and other jurisdictions with a similar pattern of disparities in children's dental caries, interventions that solely target 'at risk' individuals or the most socio-economically disadvantaged areas are not sufficient to address the social gradient in dental health. 33,34 A combination of universal and targeted approaches are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems of patient selection and under-treatment can be limited by risk adjustment of the per capita fee 9 . If patient groups with high-levels of treatment needs can be identified [10][11][12] , then these characteristics can be used in order to differentiate the per capita fee. The differentiation must not be based on characteristics that the dentist can manipulate.…”
Section: Fee-per-item Remunerationmentioning
confidence: 99%