2019
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The limitation of genetic testing in diagnosing patients suspected for congenital platelet defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously shown that the self-administered BS obtained in the WiN study was comparable to the investigator obtained BS [14] . Lastly, blood samples were drawn to measure relevant coagulation factor levels in a central laboratory for each of the studies [ 13 , 15 , 18 , 21 , 22 ]. Laboratory measurements have been described in detail previously [ 13 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that the self-administered BS obtained in the WiN study was comparable to the investigator obtained BS [14] . Lastly, blood samples were drawn to measure relevant coagulation factor levels in a central laboratory for each of the studies [ 13 , 15 , 18 , 21 , 22 ]. Laboratory measurements have been described in detail previously [ 13 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different HTS studies for diagnostics of BPD have been published but for this review, we have only focussed on the studies that have used the guidelines for variant classification as formulated by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) in 2015 [10]. Figure 2 provides an overview of the diagnostic rates obtained in these studies that however differ in terms of used HTS methods (TS or WES), studied pathologies (platelet disorders, coagulation disorders and bleeding of unknown etiology) and the number of genes and patients included [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In addition, these studies have used different inclusion criteria ranging from the selection of only patients with a known or suspected etiology (studies with typically high diagnostic rates) to patients with bleeding of unknown etiology and normal laboratory parameters (studies with very low diagnostic rates).…”
Section: Hts Technologies Used For Bpd Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Figure 2 provides an overview of the diagnostic rates obtained in these studies that however differ in terms of used HTS methods (TS or WES), studied pathologies (platelet disorders, coagulation disorders, and bleeding of unknown etiology), and the number of genes and patients included. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Most of these HTS studies provided no detailed information related to the detection of CNV. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The ThromboGenomics study reported a CNV in 40 of the 2396 tested patients; these were predicted to affect single exons (n = 11), multiple exons (n = 15), or whole genes (n = 14).…”
Section: Hts Technolog Ie S Us Ed For B Pd Diag Nos Tic Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations