The Likert Scale Attention Points Applied to Research on Attitude and Interests on Science Education

Abstract

We use a scale mainly for quantification when we study the psychological characteristics that we cannot observe. The utilization of a scale is frequent in scientific educational studies. The convenience offered by Likert scale, which is among the most frequently used, enable us to grasp characteristic attitude or recognition in students, and evaluate them against an affective domain. But a lot of errors occur, and has been noted as well in the case of utilizing Likert scale in the process. A central tendency in the utilization of Likert scale appears in this study, and the trend analyzes according to study objects and study contents, but we intend to find a way to utilize Likert scale. The results of study made on our countryside students show that the answers tend to get concentrated and a central tendency appears. Our countryside students were aware of the eyes surroundings them, have respect for elders through social experiences, and have had troubles with differentiated expression or personality in the group and cultural environments. According to the object of study, the central tendency appears more among older students than younger students, more among general students than gifted students. In the contents of study, the central tendency has been given more appearance in scope and their exposure has relatively been in large domain. Therefore when utilizing Likert scale in scientific education study, an error of central tendency appears as if they are results of the study. So, when applying the Likert scale to scientific study, we need to consider sociocultural environment, characteristics of an object and contexts of study. This enables avoiding dependence on numerical value of the utilization results, and interpret them correctly.

Development and Evaluation of a Pillow to Prevent Snoring Using the Cervical Spine Recurve Method

“…The question that directly checks the subjective satisfaction part was evaluated as points. Overall subjective satisfaction was evaluated after the experiment was conducted, by each subject filling out a Likert scale-based questionnaire to maintain consistency [ 27 ]. The subjective evaluation items were classified into discomfort and sleep quality and rated on the scale as shown in Table 5 , with 1 being “strongly disagree,” 4 being “neutral”, and 7 being “strongly agree.”…”