2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2006.00463.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Likelihood Ratio Test for the Rank of a Cointegration Submatrix*

Abstract: This paper proposes a likelihood ratio test for rank deficiency of a submatrix of the cointegrating matrix. Special cases of the test include the one of invalid normalization in systems of cointegrating equations, the feasibility of permanent-transitory decompositions and of subhypotheses related to neutrality and long-run Granger noncausality. The proposed test has a chi-squared limit distribution and indicates the validity of the normalization with probability one in the limit, for valid normalizations. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 in Boswijk, 1996, or the discussion in Luukkonen et al, 1999, which both mention the identification scheme implicit in a triangular form), noting that our particular identification scheme is valid if we estimate correctly the true r and our chosen common trends are true ones (which is the case wpa1 if r = r). The validity of our identification restrictions can be checked by the procedures of Boswijk (1996) or Luukkonen et al (1999) (which provide tests for the validity of identifying restrictions of a more general form), or by the tests for the rank of a cointegration submatrix of Kurozumi (2005) and Paruolo (2006). Note, however, that the validity of all these procedures relies on the knowledge of the cointegrating rank.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Cointegrating Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 in Boswijk, 1996, or the discussion in Luukkonen et al, 1999, which both mention the identification scheme implicit in a triangular form), noting that our particular identification scheme is valid if we estimate correctly the true r and our chosen common trends are true ones (which is the case wpa1 if r = r). The validity of our identification restrictions can be checked by the procedures of Boswijk (1996) or Luukkonen et al (1999) (which provide tests for the validity of identifying restrictions of a more general form), or by the tests for the rank of a cointegration submatrix of Kurozumi (2005) and Paruolo (2006). Note, however, that the validity of all these procedures relies on the knowledge of the cointegrating rank.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Cointegrating Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%