2018
DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘light touch’ of the Black Death in the Southern Netherlands: an urban trick?

Abstract: Although the fanciful notion that the Black Death bypassed the Low Countries has long been rejected, nevertheless a persistent view remains that the Low Countries experienced only a 'light touch' of the plague when placed in a broader European perspective, and recovered quickly and fully. However, in this article an array of dispersed sources for the Southern Netherlands together with a new mortmain accounts database for Hainaut show that the Black Death was severe, perhaps no less severe than other parts of w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Historical N e follows the same approximate trajectory for both populations but is consistently lower for the northern cluster, corroborating previous observations of increased homozygosity in northern Dutch populations 1 and consistent with a model of northerners representing a founder isolate from southerners (although a more complex demographic model may better explain these observations) 1,2 . The apparent absence of N e decline in 14 th -century Netherlands initially hints at the possibility that the Black Death had a weaker impact in the region than elsewhere in Europe; although this agrees with the views of some historians, it is hotly debated by others 29 . Per province, however, most N e estimates display a prominent dip at this time (Figure 4b), suggesting that merging non-randomly mating subpopulations into a countrywide group (Figure 4a) artificially inflates diversity, thus smoothing over any population crash following the Black Death.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Historical N e follows the same approximate trajectory for both populations but is consistently lower for the northern cluster, corroborating previous observations of increased homozygosity in northern Dutch populations 1 and consistent with a model of northerners representing a founder isolate from southerners (although a more complex demographic model may better explain these observations) 1,2 . The apparent absence of N e decline in 14 th -century Netherlands initially hints at the possibility that the Black Death had a weaker impact in the region than elsewhere in Europe; although this agrees with the views of some historians, it is hotly debated by others 29 . Per province, however, most N e estimates display a prominent dip at this time (Figure 4b), suggesting that merging non-randomly mating subpopulations into a countrywide group (Figure 4a) artificially inflates diversity, thus smoothing over any population crash following the Black Death.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The pattern was different during the two-year mortality crisis of 1438-1439 [6,29,30], which could correspond to a recurring epidemic or reflect a succession of two different diseases. In 1438, an epidemic suggestive of influenza raged through Europe [42], though in Dijon the spatial characteristics of mortality were compatible with a water-borne disease [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Dijon, the death rate of the 2,149 registered heads of household was 15.1%, which was comparable to that of one of the last great European plagues [22]. The second epidemic developed over two years [6,29,30], in 1438 (with a death rate of 5.5% among the 1,951 registered heads of household) and in 1439 (with a death rate of 10.4% among the 1,814 registered heads of household), resulting in a cumulated death toll comparable to that of 1400. This epidemic occurred after several years of devastating and generalized starvation [31] and climate variability [32].…”
Section: Years Of Epidemicmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The gaps in spatial coverage are immediately visible when taking into account data for the Low Countries, indicated in the inset. When contrasted with an appendix of locations reporting plague outbreaks in the Low Countries just for the period 1349–1500 (part b) (Roosen & Curtis, ), the extent of the spatial gap for this region becomes apparent—and this appendix is far from exhaustive…”
Section: Content Of Historical Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 92%