2020
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The life history characteristics of Neosebastes pandus and the relationship between sexually dimorphic growth and reproductive strategy among Scorpaeniformes

Abstract: Scorpaeniformes are an important component of commercial and recreational fisheries world‐wide. The Neosebastes species, found in the western Pacific and south‐east Indian Ocean, have received little attention from a research perspective. Samples of the bighead gurnard perch, Neosebastes pandus, collected from the lower west and south coasts of Western Australia, were used to undertake the first comprehensive investigation of the biological characteristics of a Neosebastes species. Opaque zones in sectioned sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the tusked specimens which show a distinct shift in shape from a conserved juvenile form to a conserved adult form through a steady progression of size, the tuskless population almost appears to have two separate allometries with divergent directions. It is possible that these differences between morphotypes indicate some kind of ontogenetic divergence by which males and females achieve different morphological phenotypes at different sizes and rates [87][88][89][90]. However, if this was the case, there is no sensible reason why a similar signal would not be uncovered in the lateral configuration.…”
Section: (B) Sexual Dimorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the tusked specimens which show a distinct shift in shape from a conserved juvenile form to a conserved adult form through a steady progression of size, the tuskless population almost appears to have two separate allometries with divergent directions. It is possible that these differences between morphotypes indicate some kind of ontogenetic divergence by which males and females achieve different morphological phenotypes at different sizes and rates [87][88][89][90]. However, if this was the case, there is no sensible reason why a similar signal would not be uncovered in the lateral configuration.…”
Section: (B) Sexual Dimorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%