Abstract:An aquatic animal faces challenges not encountered by its terrestrial counterparts, promoting adaptive responses in multiple traits. For example, a thicker dermis might protect snakes when they are pushed against sharp objects by water currents, and might enable a snake to shed fouling organisms attached to its skin. We thus predicted that marine snakes should have thicker skin than terrestrial species, and that smaller sea snakes should have relatively thicker skin (because absolute, not relative, thickness d… Show more
“…The lower observed prevalence in certain species and genera may be due to inherent resistance shared among closely related species, the smaller size of the snake resulting in smaller surface area for sampling, or sharing life history traits/habitats that are less permissive to developing ophidiomycosis. One potential explanation for differences in disease prevalence involves differences in the structure of the skin, as skin is an important immune barrier to microbial invasion 23 and skin thickness has been found to vary among snakes with different life histories 24 . Future investigations are needed to characterize the mechanisms leading to disease prevalence differences between species and should continue to sample these species in the wild, evaluate environmental factors that influence snakes' exposure to the fungus, and conduct challenge studies to evaluate disease progression and host immune responses.…”
Ophidiomycosis (snake fungal disease) is caused by the fungus Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola and threatens snake health worldwide. It has been documented throughout the eastern United States and severe cases have recently been reported in Georgia, USA. To evaluate disease distribution and prevalence in this state, 786 free-ranging snakes were examined for skin lesions consistent with ophidiomycosis and swabbed to detect O. ophiodiicola DNA using qPCR. Sampled snakes represented 34 species and 4 families; 27.5% had skin lesions, 13.3% were positive for O. ophiodiicola DNA, and 77.8% of the qPCR positive individuals had skin lesions. This is the first report of O. ophiodiicola in five of the 22 species that were qPCR positive. Multinomial logistic regression modeling indicated that Drymarchon couperi had a higher relative risk of apparent ophidiomycosis (lesions present and qPCR positive), and the best models predicting qPCR result and ophidiomycosis category included individual factors and excluded temporal and spatial factors. Phylogeny-based bipartite network analysis showed that Nerodia erythrogaster, Nerodia taxispilota, and D. couperi had the highest prevalence of apparent ophidiomycosis; this category was more prevalent in the subfamily Colubrinae and less prevalent in Natricinae. These results provide important information about ophidiomycosis epidemiology, which has implications for snake conservation.
“…The lower observed prevalence in certain species and genera may be due to inherent resistance shared among closely related species, the smaller size of the snake resulting in smaller surface area for sampling, or sharing life history traits/habitats that are less permissive to developing ophidiomycosis. One potential explanation for differences in disease prevalence involves differences in the structure of the skin, as skin is an important immune barrier to microbial invasion 23 and skin thickness has been found to vary among snakes with different life histories 24 . Future investigations are needed to characterize the mechanisms leading to disease prevalence differences between species and should continue to sample these species in the wild, evaluate environmental factors that influence snakes' exposure to the fungus, and conduct challenge studies to evaluate disease progression and host immune responses.…”
Ophidiomycosis (snake fungal disease) is caused by the fungus Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola and threatens snake health worldwide. It has been documented throughout the eastern United States and severe cases have recently been reported in Georgia, USA. To evaluate disease distribution and prevalence in this state, 786 free-ranging snakes were examined for skin lesions consistent with ophidiomycosis and swabbed to detect O. ophiodiicola DNA using qPCR. Sampled snakes represented 34 species and 4 families; 27.5% had skin lesions, 13.3% were positive for O. ophiodiicola DNA, and 77.8% of the qPCR positive individuals had skin lesions. This is the first report of O. ophiodiicola in five of the 22 species that were qPCR positive. Multinomial logistic regression modeling indicated that Drymarchon couperi had a higher relative risk of apparent ophidiomycosis (lesions present and qPCR positive), and the best models predicting qPCR result and ophidiomycosis category included individual factors and excluded temporal and spatial factors. Phylogeny-based bipartite network analysis showed that Nerodia erythrogaster, Nerodia taxispilota, and D. couperi had the highest prevalence of apparent ophidiomycosis; this category was more prevalent in the subfamily Colubrinae and less prevalent in Natricinae. These results provide important information about ophidiomycosis epidemiology, which has implications for snake conservation.
“…For example, modern cheloniids frequently visit reef environments 64 , and some species, e.g., the www.nature.com/scientificreports/ hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) and green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas), are known to subsist on food items (e.g., sponges and algae) that are common in such habitats 64 . Thus, in similarity with certain sea snakes (e.g., Aipysurus) 65,66 , the retention of prominent scales and scutes in these turtles could be a consequence of abrasive hazards imposed by corals and other sharp objects in their nearshore feeding grounds 64,66 . By contrast, the leatherback turtle is rarely observed in reef environments 67 , but instead typically inhabits pelagic settings 10 , occasionally even venturing into deep 68 and cool 69 waters in pursuit of prey.…”
The transition from terrestrial to marine environments by secondarily aquatic tetrapods necessitates a suite of adaptive changes associated with life in the sea, e.g., the scaleless skin in adult individuals of the extant leatherback turtle. A partial, yet exceptionally preserved hard-shelled (Pan-Cheloniidae) sea turtle with extensive soft-tissue remains, including epidermal scutes and a virtually complete flipper outline, was recently recovered from the Eocene Fur Formation of Denmark. Examination of the fossilized limb tissue revealed an originally soft, wrinkly skin devoid of scales, together with organic residues that contain remnant eumelanin pigment and inferred epidermal transformation products. Notably, this stem cheloniid—unlike its scaly living descendants—combined scaleless limbs with a bony carapace covered in scutes. Our findings show that the adaptive transition to neritic waters by the ancestral pan-chelonioids was more complex than hitherto appreciated, and included at least one evolutionary lineage with a mosaic of integumental features not seen in any living turtle.
“…seaweed, coral fragments). Perhaps for this reason, sea snakes tend to have thicker skin (more resistant to abrasion) than do terrestrial snakes (Shine et al., 2019). As a result of frequent and unpredictable contact with hard objects, the snakes may not interpret firm contact (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our long‐term studies on sea snakes in the Pacific archipelago of New Caledonia offer a good example of coexistence between snakes and people. New Caledonia contains at least 15 species of marine elapids: three species of amphibious Laticaudines (sea kraits) and 12 species of ‘true’ (viviparous) Hydrophiines (Ineich & Laboute, 2002; Shine et al., 2019). Several of those species are common around the capital city of Noumea, in sites used by thousands of tourists annually (Borsa, 2008).…”
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.