The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/blz136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The life aquatic: an association between habitat type and skin thickness in snakes

Abstract: An aquatic animal faces challenges not encountered by its terrestrial counterparts, promoting adaptive responses in multiple traits. For example, a thicker dermis might protect snakes when they are pushed against sharp objects by water currents, and might enable a snake to shed fouling organisms attached to its skin. We thus predicted that marine snakes should have thicker skin than terrestrial species, and that smaller sea snakes should have relatively thicker skin (because absolute, not relative, thickness d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower observed prevalence in certain species and genera may be due to inherent resistance shared among closely related species, the smaller size of the snake resulting in smaller surface area for sampling, or sharing life history traits/habitats that are less permissive to developing ophidiomycosis. One potential explanation for differences in disease prevalence involves differences in the structure of the skin, as skin is an important immune barrier to microbial invasion 23 and skin thickness has been found to vary among snakes with different life histories 24 . Future investigations are needed to characterize the mechanisms leading to disease prevalence differences between species and should continue to sample these species in the wild, evaluate environmental factors that influence snakes' exposure to the fungus, and conduct challenge studies to evaluate disease progression and host immune responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower observed prevalence in certain species and genera may be due to inherent resistance shared among closely related species, the smaller size of the snake resulting in smaller surface area for sampling, or sharing life history traits/habitats that are less permissive to developing ophidiomycosis. One potential explanation for differences in disease prevalence involves differences in the structure of the skin, as skin is an important immune barrier to microbial invasion 23 and skin thickness has been found to vary among snakes with different life histories 24 . Future investigations are needed to characterize the mechanisms leading to disease prevalence differences between species and should continue to sample these species in the wild, evaluate environmental factors that influence snakes' exposure to the fungus, and conduct challenge studies to evaluate disease progression and host immune responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, modern cheloniids frequently visit reef environments 64 , and some species, e.g., the www.nature.com/scientificreports/ hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) and green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas), are known to subsist on food items (e.g., sponges and algae) that are common in such habitats 64 . Thus, in similarity with certain sea snakes (e.g., Aipysurus) 65,66 , the retention of prominent scales and scutes in these turtles could be a consequence of abrasive hazards imposed by corals and other sharp objects in their nearshore feeding grounds 64,66 . By contrast, the leatherback turtle is rarely observed in reef environments 67 , but instead typically inhabits pelagic settings 10 , occasionally even venturing into deep 68 and cool 69 waters in pursuit of prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…seaweed, coral fragments). Perhaps for this reason, sea snakes tend to have thicker skin (more resistant to abrasion) than do terrestrial snakes (Shine et al., 2019). As a result of frequent and unpredictable contact with hard objects, the snakes may not interpret firm contact (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our long‐term studies on sea snakes in the Pacific archipelago of New Caledonia offer a good example of coexistence between snakes and people. New Caledonia contains at least 15 species of marine elapids: three species of amphibious Laticaudines (sea kraits) and 12 species of ‘true’ (viviparous) Hydrophiines (Ineich & Laboute, 2002; Shine et al., 2019). Several of those species are common around the capital city of Noumea, in sites used by thousands of tourists annually (Borsa, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%