The life and death of Irish social partnership: lessons for social pacts

Abstract

From 1987-2009, Irish social partnership operated as a national framework for industrial relations. The contribution of the paper is twofold. We seek to link the institutional dynamics of social partnership with the Régulation School's notions of modes of accumulation and regimes of régulation This framework is used to explain the rise and fall of social partnership in Ireland. We argue that the regime of social partnership in Ireland can be divided into two distinct periods. In the first, social partnership contributed positively to a benign productivity-led mode of accumulation. In the second, it lost its economic functionality due mostly to financialization taking a grip in the Irish economy.The conclusion is that social partnership had both positive and negative features, but it is unlikely to be repeated in the foreseeable future, at least not in Ireland.

The role of the state in shaping zero hours work in an atypical liberal market economy

“…Ireland represents an interesting case with which to examine the relationship between the actions of the state and zero hours work given that it is considered an LME-like or atypical liberal market economy, at least prior to the financial crisis in 2008 (Schneider and Paunescu, 2012). Ireland differed from the UK and USA as an LME because of its competitive corporatist approach to pay determination between 1987 and 2009 despite lacking the ‘institutional preconditions for national concertation on wage bargaining’ (Teague and Donaghey, 2015: 418; also see Lamare et al, 2013). In addition, Ireland had a largely liberal welfare regime which differed from other liberal regimes by having higher welfare payments, more investment in active labour market programmes and fewer sanctions and conditionality attached to benefits (Murphy, 2016).…”

Participatory governance in Ireland: Institutional innovation and the quest for joined-up thinking

“…Evaluations of the impact of social partnership and local development initiatives tend to be qualified rather than zero-sum in nature. Teague & Donaghy (2015) acknowledge the deliberative elements of national social partnership, including the unprecedented inclusion of civil society organisations, but argue that these efforts did not represent a form of new governance because their impact was not sustained and did not result in the development of new policy initiatives. Similarly, Roche (2007, p. 412) contends that deliberative approaches offered by social partnership mitigated 'political deal making' but failed to change the behaviour of the traditional social partners or the state, both of which reverted to the traditional 'postures and tactics' of industrial bargaining when deliberation did not meet their expectations.…”

(Re)making labour markets and economic crises: The case of Ireland

“…The new approach to achieving macroeconomic stability involved the introduction of a number of institutional innovations including social partnership (Teague and Donaghey, 2015). Social partnership became a central mechanism for moderating wage increases in the economy, encouraging worker productivity, maintaining an orderly industrial relations landscape (O'Donnell et al, 2010) and facilitating a wider accumulation regime (Teague and Donaghey, 2015). This together with the all-out embrace of the foreign direct investment (FDI) and financialisation of the economy over the subsequent decades would come to define Irish economic policy up until the economic crisis.…”