THE LICK AGN MONITORING PROJECT: THEM_BH-σ_*RELATION FOR REVERBERATION-MAPPED ACTIVE GALAXIES

Abstract

To investigate the black hole mass vs. stellar velocity dispersion (M BH − σ * ) relation of active galaxies, we measured the velocity dispersions of a sample of local Seyfert 1 galaxies, for which we have recently determined black hole masses using reverberation mapping. For most objects, stellar velocity dispersions were measured from high signal-to-noise ratio optical spectra centered on the Ca II triplet region (∼ 8500Å), obtained at the Keck, Palomar, and Lick Observatories. For two objects, in which the Ca II triplet region was contaminated by nuclear emission, the measurement was based on high-quality H-band spectra obtained with the OH-Suppressing Infrared Imaging Spectrograph at the Keck-II Telescope. Combining our new measurements with data from the literature, we assemble a sample of 24 active galaxies with stellar velocity dispersions and reverberation-based black hole mass measurements in the range of black hole mass 10 6 < M BH /M ⊙ < 10 9 . We use this sample to obtain reverberation mapping constraints on the slope and intrinsic scatter of the M BH − σ * relation of active galaxies. Assuming a constant virial coefficient f for the reverberation mapping black hole masses, we find a slope β = 3.55 ± 0.60 and the intrinsic scatter σ int = 0.43 ± 0.08 dex in the relation log(M BH /M ⊙ ) = α + β log(σ * /200 km s −1 ), which are consistent with those found for quiescent galaxies. We derive an updated value of the virial coefficient f by finding the value which places the reverberation masses in best agreement with the M BH − σ * relation of quiescent galaxies; using the quiescent M BH − σ * relation determined by Gültekin et al. we find log f = 0.72 +0.09 −0.10 with an intrinsic scatter of 0.44±0.07 dex. No strong correlations between f and parameters connected to the physics of accretion (such as the Eddington ratio or line-shape measurements) are found. The uncertainty of the virial coefficient remains one of the main sources of the uncertainty in black hole mass determinations using reverberation mapping, and therefore also in single-epoch spectroscopic estimates of black hole masses in active galaxies.

Selection bias in dynamically measured supermassive black hole samples: its consequences and the quest for the most fundamental relation

“…The lowered normalization of the intrinsic M bh -σ relation will serve as a more secure base for calibrating virial estimators of black hole mass for reverberation mapping-based scaling relations (e.g., Onken et al 2004;Woo et al 2010;Graham et al 2011;Park et al 2012a;Grier et al 2013;Ho & Kim 2015). The exact value of fvir, which depends on the structure, dynamics, and lineof-sight orientation of the broad line region, is indeed still a matter of intense debate (see, e.g., Yong et al 2016, for a recent discussion).…”

The cosmic growth of the active black hole population at 1 <z <2 in zCOSMOS, VVDS and SDSS

“…This method employs the virial relation M• = f RBLR∆V 2 /G, where the broad line cloud velocity ∆V is derived from the broad emission line width, f is a scale factor that accounts for the geometry and kinematics of the BLR (usually calibrated by scaling to the local M• −σ * relationship (e.g. Onken et al 2004;Woo et al 2010;Woo et al 2013), and RBLR is the broad line region size. While the latter can be directly measured via reverberation mapping (e.g.…”

Black holes in pseudobulges: demography and models

“…All the data and the models have been converted to a common Chabrier (2003) (2012) and Sani et al (2011) report BH masses from multiple sources (please see their papers for details). Finally, we also add another two BH masses from Woo et al (2010) and Mathur et al (2001). Different authors have used different techniques to estimate BH (and bulge) masses, and each technique has its own set of errors.…”