Proceedings of the 2003 Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37440)
DOI: 10.1109/pac.2003.1288647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The LHC proton beam in the cern SPS: an update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The herepresented estimate is larger but still outmatches the emittances of conventional accelerators by more than one order of magnitude (e.g. ε n ≈ 3 μm for the CERN SPS (Arduini et al, 2003)), which clearly indicates the potential benefits of laser driven particle acceleration already at this early stage. The longitudinal emittance is defined as the product of the pulse duration and the energy spread, ε long = Δτ pulse · ΔW kin , and gives a measure for the re-compressibility of the particle beam, in analogy to the time-bandwidth-product of short laser pulses (cf.…”
Section: Comparison To Conventional Acceleratorsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The herepresented estimate is larger but still outmatches the emittances of conventional accelerators by more than one order of magnitude (e.g. ε n ≈ 3 μm for the CERN SPS (Arduini et al, 2003)), which clearly indicates the potential benefits of laser driven particle acceleration already at this early stage. The longitudinal emittance is defined as the product of the pulse duration and the energy spread, ε long = Δτ pulse · ΔW kin , and gives a measure for the re-compressibility of the particle beam, in analogy to the time-bandwidth-product of short laser pulses (cf.…”
Section: Comparison To Conventional Acceleratorsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Even if the pulse duration is conservatively approximated by the lifetime of the TNSA sheath field of roughly 10 ps, one still finds a theoretical emittance of ε long ≈ 2 · 10 −6 eVs, which is many orders of magnitude below the values achieved by conventional accelerators (e.g. ε long ≈ 0.35 eV s for CERN SPS (Arduini et al, 2003)). …”
Section: Comparison To Conventional Acceleratorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a result, the bunches show an increased tail population which could lead to losses at injection into the LHC due to uncaptured particles. To overcome these problems, the SPS impedance has been decreased and unused cavities have been removed [1][2][3]. Microwave instabilities are no longer observed at low energy, but coupled bunch instabilities still appear starting at energies between 200 and 280 GeV and continuing up to high energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With improved multipactoring control they should also allow low voltage without counterphasing, thus easing operation under beam loading [7]. In 2002, after the scrubbing run at the beginning of the operation year, the nominal intensity could be reached without serious problems from vacuum pressure increase due to e-cloud [6]. As a result of all upgrades to the 200 MHz RF system, this beam was stable on the flat bottom.…”
Section: Impedance Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%