The LGBTQ Responsive Model for Supervision of Group Work

What Don’t We Know About Group Work?

“…Rubel and Atieno Okech (Atieno Okech, & Rubel, 2007;Rubel & Atieno Okech, 2006), as well as Goodrich and Luke (Goodrich & Luke, 2011;Luke & Goodrich, 2013), have written about different models of supervision of group work, but little scholarship has attended to the process and outcomes of this work. If we as an association truly love groups, and want to ensure that groups operate appropriately in our different professional contexts, we should ensure that group work receives appropriate attention through clinical supervision, including measuring the outcomes of such.…”

Broaching as a strategy for intercultural understanding in clinical supervision

“…These key counseling skills, in turn, have been shown to positively affect client outcomes (Ancis & Marshall, 2010;Nilsson & Duan, 2007). In several studies, supervisors' discussion of cultural identities allowed supervisees to process their emotions toward multicultural differences within the supervisory relationship and counseling dyad, notice biases held about different populations, and explore their own identities, as well as their clients' identities (Glosoff & Durham, 2010;Goodrich & Luke, 2011;Wong et al, 2013).…”

LGBTQ* Responsive Sand Tray: Creative Arts and Counseling

“…Accordingly, the transtheoretical LGBTQ* responsive supervision models (Goodrich & Luke, 2009Luke & Goodrich, 2012, 2013, 2015a, 2015b and the four stages of ST work identified by Stark and Frels (2014) have been combined to expand the ST and supervision literature aimed at fostering LGBTQ* competence, as they are purported to be pragmatic and flexible models. Additionally, given that the models developed by Goodrich and Luke (2011) and Luke and Goodrich (2012, 2013, 2015a, 2015b were focused on expanding counselors' abilities to serve LGBTQ* persons as well as the various concerns presented by LGBTQ* persons, these models provided an LGBTQ* centered framework. Unlike other LGBTQ* oriented supervision frameworks or models, such as the Integrative Affirmative Supervision Model (Halpert, Reinhardt, & Toohey, 2007) or the Queer People of Color Resilience-Based Model of Supervision (Chun & Singh, 2010), Goodrich and Luke (2011) and Luke and Goodrich (2012, 2013, 2015a, 2015b models were developed for individual and group supervision; allot for various intersecting affectional orientations, gender identities, and sexualities; have been examined empirically; are pragmatic in nature; and can be used across different counseling and supervision theories (Luke & Goodrich, 2013;Miller & Luke, 2018).…”