2011
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0142-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lexical Stroop Sort (LSS) picture-word task: A computerized task for assessing the relationship between language and executive functioning in school-aged children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(113 reference statements)
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This aligns with other work that suggests that language interacts with inhibition abilities in a lexical Stroop task in children with ASD and children with typical development (Eskes, Bryson, & McCormick, 1990; Wilbourn et al, 2012). Similar to our findings, it has been suggested that working memory, but also inhibition, affects the efficient use of resources to activate relevant information in language tasks in children with SLI (Im-Bolter, Johnson, & Pascual-Leone, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This aligns with other work that suggests that language interacts with inhibition abilities in a lexical Stroop task in children with ASD and children with typical development (Eskes, Bryson, & McCormick, 1990; Wilbourn et al, 2012). Similar to our findings, it has been suggested that working memory, but also inhibition, affects the efficient use of resources to activate relevant information in language tasks in children with SLI (Im-Bolter, Johnson, & Pascual-Leone, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The HCSM suggests that language enables reflection and objective conscious consideration. As would be predicted by this model, associations with vocabulary knowledge and performance on EF tasks, such as the Lexical Stroop Sort and the Dimensional Change Card Sort, are documented in the literature (Wilbourn, Kurtz, & Kalia, 2012). School-age children with typical development often show improved performance on EF sorting tasks when they are allowed to verbalize strategies that they are using in the task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Considering previous research comparing DLLs to monolinguals has found an advantage in EF favoring the DLLs (e.g., Barac & Bialystok, 2012; Esposito & Baker-Ward, 2013; Nicolay & Poncelet, 2015; Poarch & Van Hell, 2012), our first prediction was that the DLLs would outperform the monolinguals on the DCCS. Although EF benefits, favoring DLLs, in language-based tasks have not been reported our research has shown that children's performance on the DCCS and LSS are positively correlated (Wilbourn et al, 2012) so we predicted that if the DLL children outperformed the monolinguals on the DCCS task they would also show an advantage on the LSS. In order to succeed in the two EF tasks we used in our study, children would have to devote attentional resources to remember relational rules used to sort stimuli; so our second prediction was that the children's performance on the two EF tasks would be positively associated.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Why would vocabulary scores impact group differences in LSS, but not DCCS? Unlike the DCCS, the LSS task was specifically designed to tap into children's language processing skills (Wilbourn et al, 2012). It requires children to process relational information through their phonological loop and semantic knowledge base at both levels (i.e., stimulus attributes and abstract if-then level).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed recent evidence suggests that these two critical cognitive functions follow similar developmental trajectories (Wilbourn et al, 2011). During preadolescence, children display major increases in verbal working memory (Brocki and Bohlin, 2004); goal-directed behavior (Anderson et al, 2001); response inhibition, selective attention (Klimkeit et al, 2004); and strategic planning and organizational skills (De Luca et al, 2003; Luciana and Nelson, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%