2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-010-0293-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lévy–Khintchine type operators with variable Lipschitz continuous coefficients generate linear or nonlinear Markov processes and semigroups

Abstract: Ito's construction of Markovian solutions to stochastic equations driven by a Lévy noise is extended to nonlinear distribution dependent integrands aiming at the effective construction of linear and nonlinear Markov semigroups and the corresponding processes with a given pseudo-differential generator. It is shown that a conditionally positive integro-differential operator (of the Lévy-Khintchine type) with variable coefficients (diffusion, drift and Lévy measure) depending Lipschitz continuously on its paramet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to [4,[14][15][16][17][18] for the links between Markov processes and pseudo-differential operators.…”
Section: Notations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [4,[14][15][16][17][18] for the links between Markov processes and pseudo-differential operators.…”
Section: Notations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 2.5 More generally, one may specify the price process S by directly prescribing its generator to act on sufficiently regular functions f as where is given in () and where for every , is a (Lévy) measure with support in (−1, ∞) such that The discounted process {e −γ t S t } t ≥ 0 is a local martingale. Sufficient conditions on σ and ν to guarantee the existence of a Feller process S corresponding to this generator were established in Kolokoltsov (2009, theorem 1.1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which implies the first estimate in (25) first for small times, which is then extended to all finite times by the iteration. The second estimate in (25) follows from (8).…”
Section: Nonlinear Propagatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%