1976
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1976-0409899-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Levi form and local complex foliations

Abstract: Abstract. A short coordinate-free proof is given for some known results on the existence of local complex-analytic foliations of a real submanifold M of C". The proof uses an explicit formulation of the equivalence between two definitions of the E. E. Levi form of M.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are interested in knowing whether S might inherit any complex structure from C", that is we are interested in knowing whether there is a foliation 9 of S by manifolds that are complex submanifolds of C". A well known approach to this problem is to show that the Levi distribution LS is integrable, see Sommer [ll] and Freeman [ 5 ] . In a certain sense the Levi foliation is the smallest possible foliation one can look for.…”
Section: The Levi Foliationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are interested in knowing whether S might inherit any complex structure from C", that is we are interested in knowing whether there is a foliation 9 of S by manifolds that are complex submanifolds of C". A well known approach to this problem is to show that the Levi distribution LS is integrable, see Sommer [ll] and Freeman [ 5 ] . In a certain sense the Levi foliation is the smallest possible foliation one can look for.…”
Section: The Levi Foliationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This completes the proof of Lemma 3. We remark that a similar use of the Jacobi identity occurs in [15].…”
Section: Suppose That We Can Show That [J (A) A] Is a Linear Combinamentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Thus the commutator we are interested in is X 1 , X 1 = 2i[B, J (B)]. If X 1 were a Levi null field in a full neighborhood of P , then [X 1 , X 1 ] would likewise be ( [15]). However, we only know that L(X 1 , X 1 ) = 0 on M. What we can assert is that…”
Section: Suppose That We Can Show That [J (A) A] Is a Linear Combinamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the dimension of the null space of the Levi form is constant at every y ∈ U x ∩bΩ and satisfies dim N y ≥ q. The foliation result of Freeman and Sommer ([19], [20], [9], [10]), which holds regardless of pseudoconvexity, implies the open set U x ∩ bΩ in the boundary of the domain is foliated by complex manifolds of dimension equal to this constant dimension of the null space of the Levi form, which is at least q. This violates finite D'Angelo q-type that is assumed to hold on all of Ũ ∩ bΩ.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%