2013
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201208060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The level of origin firing inversely affects the rate of replication fork progression

Abstract: Cells with reduced origin firing have an increased rate of replication fork progression, whereas fork progression is slowed in cells with excess origins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
91
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
16
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keeping in mind that fork arrest at Ter occurred in psf1-1 and WT cells but not in cdc7-1 at 37°C, the data suggested that there was no detectable correlation between the relative rate of fork progression and fork arrest at Ter. It should be noted that the psf1 and WT tracts are longer in the DNA combing profile because initiation was blocked in cdc7-1 and psf1-1 cells, and those that initiated, presumably because of less competition for existing initiation factors, cause somewhat faster fork movement (56). Key Role for DDK-Catalyzed Phosphorylation in PFA.…”
Section: Dna Combing Showed No Correspondence Between Replication Forkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Keeping in mind that fork arrest at Ter occurred in psf1-1 and WT cells but not in cdc7-1 at 37°C, the data suggested that there was no detectable correlation between the relative rate of fork progression and fork arrest at Ter. It should be noted that the psf1 and WT tracts are longer in the DNA combing profile because initiation was blocked in cdc7-1 and psf1-1 cells, and those that initiated, presumably because of less competition for existing initiation factors, cause somewhat faster fork movement (56). Key Role for DDK-Catalyzed Phosphorylation in PFA.…”
Section: Dna Combing Showed No Correspondence Between Replication Forkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FACS analysis was performed on either a synchronous or asynchronous culture grown at 24°C or 37°C as described (56).…”
Section: Analysis Of Mcm4 Phosphorylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of SIRT7 resulted in a significant reduction in DNA replication fork velocity in SirT7 −/− primary MEFs as compared with WT, which became exacerbated as cells were kept in culture (Fig 4H and I). Reduced replication rate often correlates with increased activation of dormant origins of replication, which is believe to be an attempt to rescue global replication rate after forks collapsed (Zhong et al , 2013). Consistently, we observed a remarkable increase in the presence of stalled replication forks and in the firing of new origins of replication upon replication block with HU in SirT7 −/− primary MEFs as compared with WT (Fig EV2A–C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the level of origin firing inversely affected the rate of fork progression (Zhong et al 2013) presumably because active forks compete for limiting dNTP pools, which is an important determinant of fork progression (Poli et al 2012). Since Mcm4 NSD, Sld3, and Dbf4 mutation increased the number of origins that were activated, it was possible that their effects on replication fork progression in HU were in part the consequence of competition for limiting dNTP pools or limiting DNA replication proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%