The level of environmental noise affects the physiological performance of Glycine max under water deficit

Abstract

Plants in natural environments are subjected to a multitude of environmental cues. However, studies addressing physiological analyzes are usually focused on the isolation of a stress factor, making it difficult to understand plants behavior in their extremely complex natural environments. Herein, we analyzed how environmental variability (noise) may influence physiological processes of Glycine max under water deficit conditions. The plants were kept in a greenhouse (semi-controlled environment -E SC ) and in a growth chamber (controlled environment -E C ) under two water regime conditions (100 and 30% of replacement of the water lost by evapotranspiration) for 30 days. The environmental variability was daily monitored with automatic sensors to record temperature, humidity, and irradiance. The physiological responses were analyzed by leaf gas exchanges, chlorophyll fluorescence, biomembrane integrity, and growth parameters. The results showed that water deficiency caused significant reductions in the physiological parameters evaluated. However, the environment with high variability (E SC ) caused more extensive damages to biomembranes, regardless the water regime likely compromising physiological efficiency. The lower variability of E C promoted higher efficiency of total biomass production in both water regimes compared to the E SC . Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that more variable environmental conditions can limit the growth of Glycine max in response to the fluctuation of resources, therefore amplifying the effect of water deficit.

Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field

“…Usually, light intensities in the field are highest around noon, whereas air temperature is highest somewhere in the afternoon and lowest at the end of the night. This variation likely has a negative effect on growth (Bertolli & Souza, ) but positive consequences for the diurnal rhythm of the plants (Fondy et al ., ). The same is true for light quality, with (end‐of‐day) far‐red illumination as a clear example of how plant morphology is affected (Cummings et al ., ).…”

Understanding photosynthesis in a spatial–temporal multiscale: The need for a systemic view

“…Furthermore, this is a huge problem, especially when we need to consider that all processes, regardless of a specific scale, are embedded in a “noisy” environment! For instance, Bertolli and Souza ( 2013 ) showed that the photosynthetic responses of soybean plants, subjected to a same water deficit stimulus, were significantly affected by specific environmental fluctuations of abiotic factors (temperature, light and air humidity). However, their averages were pretty much similar between independent experiments.…”

Foliar photochemical processes and carbon metabolism under favourable and adverse winter conditions in a Mediterranean mixed forest, Catalonia (Spain)

“…The term photosynthetic capacity is here dismissed, despite its frequent use in the literature, to avoid confusion with studies that have used this term for the maximum rate of assimilation under saturating light conditions (e.g. Bertolli and Souza, 2013).…”