2022
DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-2416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The level and integrity of plasma circulating cell-free DNA in patients with primary multiple myeloma

Abstract: Background: To evaluate the clinical research related to the level and integrity of circulating free DNA (cfDNA) in the plasma of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods:The plasma samples of 56 patients with newly diagnosed MM and 60 healthy volunteers were collected. ALU247 fragment and ALU115 fragment were used as target genes, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to assess the plasma of the patient and healthy control groups. The cfDNA level in MM was analyzed, and the ALU247/ALU… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the cfDNA in PJ may potentially be contaminated with high concentrations of genomic DNA (as a result of cell decay during collection). Conversely, the higher Alu247/Alu115 ratio in PJ may be due to its close relation with PC and may be a measure of cell necrosis (rather than apoptosis), as necrosis produces longer cfDNA fragments [14][15][16][17]. If so, the Alu247/Alu115 ratio in PJ may be a measure of tumor volume and response to therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the cfDNA in PJ may potentially be contaminated with high concentrations of genomic DNA (as a result of cell decay during collection). Conversely, the higher Alu247/Alu115 ratio in PJ may be due to its close relation with PC and may be a measure of cell necrosis (rather than apoptosis), as necrosis produces longer cfDNA fragments [14][15][16][17]. If so, the Alu247/Alu115 ratio in PJ may be a measure of tumor volume and response to therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each step involves numerous conditions or details, and the variables interact with each other. Moreover, many studies inadequately describe the preanalytical variables for cfDNA analysis in their Materials and Methods sections ( Campbell et al, 2015 ; Wolf-Doty et al, 2021 ; Shen et al, 2022 ), leading to questionable credibility of analytical results and inefficiency in method verification. Diao et al surveyed the quality assurance (the questionnaire included preanalysis, postanalysis and performance validation for mNGS) of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) used for detecting microbial cfDNA in blood samples across 80 laboratories in China and found significant variation in the mNGS workflow among the laboratories ( Diao et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%