The Length of the Greater Palatine Canal in a Lebanese Population: a Radio-anatomical Study

Aoun, Georges; Nasseh, Ibrahim

doi:10.5455/aim.2016.24.397-400

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of the meta-analysis regarding other characteristics of the GPC are presented in Table 8 . A total of 13 studies [ 3 , 4 , 23 , 25 , 34 , 35 , 50 , 52 , 59 , 67 , 70 , 75 , 76 ] ( n = 4,798 subjects) reported data on the length of the greater palatine canal. The pooled mean, across the 13 studies, was calculated to be 26.97 mm (95% CI = 23.65–30.29 mm).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Anatomy of the greater palatine foramen and canal and their clinical significance in relation to the greater palatine artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Accurate knowledge of greater palatine foramen (GPF) and greater palatine canal (GPC) anatomy is necessary to avoid injury to the greater palatine artery (GPA) when performing a variety of anesthesiologic, dental or surgical procedures. The aim of this paper was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature on the anatomy and localization of bony structures associated with the GPA, namely the GPF and GPC. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases. Seventy-five studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 22,202 subjects). Results The meta-analysis showed that the GPF is positioned 17.21 mm (95% CI = 16.34–18.09 mm) from the posterior nasal spine, 2.56 mm (95% CI = 1.90–3.22 mm) from the posterior border of the hard palate, 46.24 mm (95% CI = 44.30–48.18 mm) from the anterior nasal spine, 15.22 mm (95% CI = 15.00–15.43 mm) from the midline maxillary suture, 37.32 mm (95% CI = 36.19–38.45 mm) from the incisive foramen, and opposite the third maxillary molar (M3) in 64.9% (58.7–70.7%) of the total population. Conclusion An up-to-date, comprehensive analysis of GPF and GPC clinical anatomy is presented. The results from this evidence-based anatomical study provides a unified set of data to aid clinicians in their practice.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of 3 studies [ 3 , 25 , 59 ] ( n = 360) reported data on the anteroposterior diameter of the upper opening of the greater palatine canal. The pooled mean, across the three studies, was calculated to be 3.88 mm (95% CI = 3.77–3.99 mm).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anatomy of the greater palatine foramen and canal and their clinical significance in relation to the greater palatine artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Morphometric evaluation and clinical implications of the greater palatine foramen, greater palatine canal and pterygopalatine fossa on CBCT images and review of literature

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anatomy of the greater palatine foramen and canal and their clinical significance in relation to the greater palatine artery – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kim

Tempski

Surma

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Accurate knowledge of greater palatine foramen (GPF) and greater palatine canal (GPC) anatomy is necessary to avoid injury to the greater palatine artery (GPA) when performing a variety of anesthesiologic, dental or surgical procedures. The aim of this paper was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature on the anatomy and localization of bony structures associated with the GPA, namely the GPF and GPC. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases. Sixty-seven studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 11,101 subjects). The meta-analysis showed that the GPF is positioned 17.21 mm (95% CI = 16.34–18.09 mm) from the posterior nasal spine, 2.56 mm (95% CI = 1.90–3.22 mm) from the posterior border of the hard palate, 46.24 mm (95% CI = 44.30–48.18 mm) from the anterior nasal spine, 15.22 mm (95% CI = 15.00–15.43 mm) from the midline maxillary suture, 37.32 mm (95% CI = 36.19–38.45 mm) from the incisive foramen, and opposite the third maxillary molar (M3) in 64.9% (58.7–70.7%) of the total population.

show abstract

The Length of the Greater Palatine Canal in a Lebanese Population: a Radio-anatomical Study

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

Anatomy of the greater palatine foramen and canal and their clinical significance in relation to the greater palatine artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anatomy of the greater palatine foramen and canal and their clinical significance in relation to the greater palatine artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Morphometric evaluation and clinical implications of the greater palatine foramen, greater palatine canal and pterygopalatine fossa on CBCT images and review of literature

Anatomy of the greater palatine foramen and canal and their clinical significance in relation to the greater palatine artery – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About