2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11905-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Legislature and Law Making in Nigeria: Interrogating the National Assembly (1999–2018)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By implication, the results also showed that in 1999-2015, the parliament was able to pass 248 bills into law (Muheeb, 2019), but in 2015-2019, it passed 213 bills. It showed a greater performance (Oni et al, 2019;Umoru, 2018). However, Muheeb (2019) added that aside the above achievements, politics of personality which emanated from the crisis impacted more negatively on the political system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By implication, the results also showed that in 1999-2015, the parliament was able to pass 248 bills into law (Muheeb, 2019), but in 2015-2019, it passed 213 bills. It showed a greater performance (Oni et al, 2019;Umoru, 2018). However, Muheeb (2019) added that aside the above achievements, politics of personality which emanated from the crisis impacted more negatively on the political system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They concluded that it could affect good governance and render the early delivery of democratic dividends futile. According to Muheeb (2019) the parliament between 1999 and 2015, before the emergence of the APC government, passed a total of 248 bills into law, but from June 9, 2015 to July 2018, it passed 213 bills into law (Oni et al, 2019;Umoru, 2018). This was notwithstanding the crisis between the two institutions.…”
Section: Conflict To Good Governance In Nigeriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manipulation of ethno-religious factors for political ascendancy noticeably became serious centrifugal forces, which threatened the corporate existence of the nation (Falola et al , 1994). The incursion of the military was therefore only a matter of time as it was obvious that there was no way the post-independent social, economic and technology climate could have guaranteed a stable polity (Oni and Onimode, 1975; Onimode, 1985). Thus, the military eventually took power through a coup d'état in January 1966 in a bid to correct the misrule of the democratic administration and to check the drift towards anarchy and disintegration (Ajayi, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%