The Legal Regime of the Decisions of University Ethics Commissions in the Current Jurisprudential Interpretation

Abstract

In The legal liability for violating the norms of good conduct in the research activity specific to the university norm, respectively the responsibility in case of violation of the norms regarding the ethics and deontology of the teaching profession, are forms of legal liability of teachers 1/2011. Considering the employment relationship of the teaching staff, contractual relationship in the exercise of a public education service, and the special prerogatives of the University Ethics Commission, as regulated by the legal regime of this institutional body of research and decision in art.306 Law no. 1/2011, corroborated with the solutions of the courts of the last decade in the litigations having as object the contestation of the decisions of the university ethics commission, appears as necessary the substantive analysis of the legal regime of the decisions of the university ethics commission for the correct identification of the legislator's will. This study starts from the legal text by referring to the solutions of the courts, using a method of comparative research of the considerations of the sentences and the text of the normative act.

Nanoscale Composite Protective Preparation for Cars Paint and Varnish Coatings

“…In addition to anthropogenic factors, bird and insect droppings, wood tar, residual tar, dirt, ice and ultraviolet radiation also have a negative impact on the cars paint and varnish coatings [4][5][6]. In this regard, the development of methods for the protection of cars paint and varnish coatings is a relevant task.…”

From Problems to a Model of Action: Romanian University Ethics Commissions - Case Study

“…These problems are based on the lack of express regulations regarding the legal nature of the ESCs acts which permitted different approaches in the court of law (Figure 1) (chart made using the tools in Coggle): The result of research on national jurisprudence [49], in case of contesting the sanctions enforced by the ESC (Figure 1), has shown the following possibilities:…”

“…They are elected due to their professional prestige and moral authority. This coupled with a lack of clarity and legislative incoherence has led to major differences between the procedures of different ESCs, among which we must mention: the steps to file a claim before the commission, ensuring anonymity of the parties involved in the procedure of investigating the claim, terms for solving these claims [47], procedures of communicating with the parties which are involved, the legal regime and the enforcement of the decisions of the commission [48,49], ensuring a balanced component of ESCs (which includes teaching and support staff and the students).…”

"BREVIAR Noua viziune privind comisiile de etică în proiectul de lege privind învățământul superior"

“…Salutăm în acest sens inițiativa de a exista un Regulamentul cadru de organizare și funcționare a comisiilor de etică aprobat prin ordin al ministrului de resort (art. 169 NPL), deoarece, practica actuală a elaborării propriilor regulamente ale comisiilor de etică a arătat că există mari și importante diferențe de abordare a procedurilor comisiilor (Salcă Rotaru, 2018;Manea & Salcă Rotaru, 2021).…”