2009
DOI: 10.1080/13523270902861053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Legacy of the ‘Coloured Revolutions’: The Case of Kazakhstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to the 2001 anti-regime rallies, Nazarbayev had gutted the main rival party, DCK ( Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan ), by jailing its main leaders in 2002. Internal fractions and inexperience then did the rest (Ostrowski, 2009). In 2002 the Majlis passed a set of reforms banning ethnic, religious, and gender-based parties and introducing membership requirements (Ó Beacháin, 2005) which neutralized the main social cleavages (Russian/Kazakh and Islamic/secular).…”
Section: The Four Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In response to the 2001 anti-regime rallies, Nazarbayev had gutted the main rival party, DCK ( Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan ), by jailing its main leaders in 2002. Internal fractions and inexperience then did the rest (Ostrowski, 2009). In 2002 the Majlis passed a set of reforms banning ethnic, religious, and gender-based parties and introducing membership requirements (Ó Beacháin, 2005) which neutralized the main social cleavages (Russian/Kazakh and Islamic/secular).…”
Section: The Four Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In March 2005, a new ban on political rallies and protests targeting electoral results 13 had effectively stifled any possible animosity in the scarcely-covered campaign. A 5-year rise in oil revenues allowed Nazarbayev to promise higher public wages and more public housing (Ostrowski, 2009). His incumbent advantage approaching the election was remarkable, with approval ratings measured at 70% in September of 2005.…”
Section: The Four Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the literature on the colored revolutions in postcommunist politics has focused largely on either macrostructural or economic reasons for their occurrence (Radnitz, ; Way, ; Nikolayenko, ), the diffusion of colored revolutions across the region (Beissinger, ; for a criticism, see Way, ), regime reactions to colored revolutions (especially to contain or preempt such revolts) (Finkel and Brudny, ; Silitsky, ; Way, ), or the individual psychological factors and motivations for participation in mass protests that led to the color revolutions in the first place (Beissinger, ; Tucker, ). Further, there has been some limited work on the political consequences of the colored revolutions (see, for instance, Kalandadze and Orenstein, ; Ostrowski, ) but this work has focused on macro‐level political consequences (such as the emergence of democracy) or on a single country (Beissinger, ; Ostrowski, ). What is generally missing from the literature is the examination of the effects of the colored revolutions on individual‐level attitudes that support democracy—particularly social trust and institutional trust.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por un lado, en cuanto al marco político, en el nivel central destaca la implementación de compromisos e iniciativas para acomodar una pluralidad de élites en instituciones donde compartir poder y acceso a recursos. Entre ellas destacan el Parlamento o el partido oficialista Nur Otan (Ostrowski, 2009). En la esfera económica se cumple ese mismo objetivo, el de la inclusión de las principales agrupaciones políticas informales, con la creación de holdings estatales tales como Samruk-Kazyna.…”
Section: Uzbekistán: Alta Concentración Del Poder De Decisión Y Débilunclassified