2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.915345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Legacy of History for Development: The Case of Putnam's Social Capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But social capital is not always used to benefit entire societies; it can be confined within small groups that use it for exclusive benefits at the cost of others. Such ties are manifested as mafias, gangs or parochial interest groups that may stifle social interaction and economic development [108,121]. Treaties, constitutions and institutes that stand for political, economic and social organizations that determine the working environment for systems to develop are established to prevent such negative effects.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But social capital is not always used to benefit entire societies; it can be confined within small groups that use it for exclusive benefits at the cost of others. Such ties are manifested as mafias, gangs or parochial interest groups that may stifle social interaction and economic development [108,121]. Treaties, constitutions and institutes that stand for political, economic and social organizations that determine the working environment for systems to develop are established to prevent such negative effects.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It occurs between family members of every economic status, and among friends and acquaintances that have similar backgrounds and beliefs [81,107,108,121]. Networks can bridge bonded groups.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the differences in social capital are more or less persistent through time. For instance, Putnam, Leonardi, and Nanetti (1993) and de Blasio and Nuzzo (2006) argue that the regions that were rich in social capital in the 19th century are also well-endowed nowadays. Moreover, as shown in chapter 3 the historical variables affect income growth through social capital not by any other mechanism (in statistical terms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%