2012
DOI: 10.1080/13530194.2012.726489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The League of Arab States and Regional Security: Towards an Arab Security Community?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The AL involves 22 members from Asia and Africa, and it has been recognized by the United Nations. The AL principles are formed on the basis of promoting good relations between Arab countries, to harmonize their interests, to solve problems within the scope of the AL members, to promote the interests of Arab states, and to support members to become independent states (Dakhlallah, 2012 ; Hedstrom, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AL involves 22 members from Asia and Africa, and it has been recognized by the United Nations. The AL principles are formed on the basis of promoting good relations between Arab countries, to harmonize their interests, to solve problems within the scope of the AL members, to promote the interests of Arab states, and to support members to become independent states (Dakhlallah, 2012 ; Hedstrom, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liga Arab merupakan produk dilema antara kedaulatan negara dan nasionalisme Arab yang melanda tatanan regional Arab selama beberapa dekade (Dakhlallah, 2012). Tidak seperti kebanyakan organisasi regional lainnya, seperti Uni Eropa, ASEAN, African Union, kriteria utama untuk keanggotaan di Liga Arab adalah perasamaan etno-budaya daripada kedekatan geografis, yaitu identitas arabisme.…”
Section: Jurnal Transformasi Global [133]unclassified
“…It is in the early 2000s, for example, that European integration theory comes to the fore (Wiener & Diez, 2003), and that Europe's experience is analysed in the wider normative and institutional structure of world politics (Diez & Whitman, 2002; see also Stivachtis, 2008). Yet, at the same time, it is undeniable that in this and the following decade the field of regionalism finally ventures solidly into non-European domains, establishing real sub-fields within itself: African regionalism (Fagbayibo, 2018;Fioramonti & Mattheis, 2015;Nathan, 2010) Middle Eastern regionalism (Beck, 2015;Dakhalallah, 2012;Ibrahim, 2018), South American regionalism (Malamud & Gardini, 2012;Quiliconi & Espinoza, 2017;Riggirozzi, 2012), (South-)East Asian regionalism (Acharya, 2017;Beeson, 2018;Beeson & Lee-Brown, 2017;Goh, 2011;Katada, 2011), Eurasian regionalism (Allison, 2008;Aris, 2011;Libman & Vinokurov, 2018) and even Arctic regionalism (Ingimundarson, 2014;Young, 2005;Zimmerbauer, 2013).…”
Section: Sharpening the Approach To Regionalism Development Of Regionness And Interregionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%