1934
DOI: 10.1037/h0073664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The law of effect as a principle of learning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1947
1947
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In trying to evaluate the arguments for and against retroaction, one is struck by the fact that the battle has been fought largely on the plane of logic (312). There can be no doubt that rewards and punishments following responses modify these responses on the occasion of their recurrence.…”
Section: The Classical Objections To Retroactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In trying to evaluate the arguments for and against retroaction, one is struck by the fact that the battle has been fought largely on the plane of logic (312). There can be no doubt that rewards and punishments following responses modify these responses on the occasion of their recurrence.…”
Section: The Classical Objections To Retroactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavior modification gained popularity throughout the 1950s and 1960s as an antithesis to the prevailing psychodynamic approach to the treatment of mental illness. The earliest behaviorists were interested in manipulating the stimulusresponse connection in order to change a maladaptive behavior into an adaptive behavior (Bruck 1968), extending and elaborating upon Thorndike's "law of effect" (Waters 1934). These foundational behaviorists based these techniques on learning theories, including Pavlov's classical conditioning, Wolpe's counterconditioning, and Skinner's operant conditioning (Bruck 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys of the history of the drivereduction view (22,28) show that the arguments of its opponents have been not only vigorous, but well diversified. Some writers, placing their trust in the principle of parsimony, have insisted that stimulus-response contiguity alone is sufficient to account for the growth of associative bonds, additional factors of decreased drive or tension being unnecessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%