2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44649-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lattice Boltzmann Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
188
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
188
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the LBM, if not, the reader may consult Refs. [41][42][43]. The CGM and PPM used for the benchmarks are, respectively, from Leclaire et al 35 and Porter et al 13 These models are not described in this article and the reader may consult the previously mention references for a better understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the LBM, if not, the reader may consult Refs. [41][42][43]. The CGM and PPM used for the benchmarks are, respectively, from Leclaire et al 35 and Porter et al 13 These models are not described in this article and the reader may consult the previously mention references for a better understanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluid flow was simulated under the assumptions of steady, saturated flow at small Mach number using the lattice Boltzmann (LB) method. The LB method solves the discrete-velocity Boltzmann equation for the fluid mass and momentum density distributions (Sterling and Chen, 1996; Maier et al, 1998; Maier and Bernard, 2010; Krüger et al, 2016). The method is a pseudo-transient, explicit scheme for recovering Navier-Stokes behavior in the low Mach-number limit.…”
Section: Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is a pseudo-transient, explicit scheme for recovering Navier-Stokes behavior in the low Mach-number limit. The LB equations are solved on a regular 3-D grid with the D3Q19 method (Maier et al, 1998; Wagner, 2008; Krüger et al, 2016), in which physical space is discretized on a computational grid and velocity space is represented at each point by a set of 19 direction vectors. The computational grid is superimposed on the packed bed geometry and calculations are carried out in the fluid region of the grid.…”
Section: Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the simplicity of the BGK collision operator comes at a cost: reduced accuracy, particularly at large viscosities, and stability, particularly at small viscosities. 31 To overcome these shortcomings, the multi-relaxation-time (MRT) collision operator 32 is useful since each of the moments can be relaxed at different time scales to achieve better stability and accuracy. In order to do this, all populations f i must first be transformed to moment space, in which the collision step is performed, and then transformed back into population space, where the streaming step is performed.…”
Section: ( √ 3δtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others implement bounce-back-based coupling algorithms that are not exactly mass conserving or that require interpolations, which may be troublesome in dense particle assemblies with small pore sizes. 31 To this end, a coupling algorithm was developed based on the volume-fraction approach 9 to consider three-dimensional convex polyhedral particles moving through the fluid mesh where the solid particles are modeled using DEM and the fluid phase is modeled using LBM. The coupling process is implemented using the multi-relaxation-time (MRT) LBM which offers improved numerical stability and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%